• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压患者中,中心血压、动态血压、家庭血压及诊室血压测量作为轻度认知障碍风险标志物的比较

Comparison of Central, Ambulatory, Home and Office Blood Pressure Measurement as Risk Markers for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Hypertensive Patients.

作者信息

Yaneva-Sirakova Teodora, Traykov Latchezar, Petrova Julia, Vassilev Dobrin

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Clinic, Sofia Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Department of Neurology, Neurology Clinic, Sofia Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2017 Aug 29;7(2):274-282. doi: 10.1159/000479365. eCollection 2017 May-Aug.

DOI:10.1159/000479365
PMID:29033973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5624259/
Abstract

AIMS

We compared the role of central blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home-measured BP (HMBP) and office BP measurement as risk markers for the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHODS

70 hypertensive patients on combination medical therapy were studied. Their mean age was 64.97 ± 8.88 years. Eighteen (25.71%) were males and 52 (74.28%) females. All of the patients underwent full physical examination, laboratory screening, echocardiography, and office, ambulatory, home and central BP measurement. The neuropsychological tests used were: Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). SPSS 19 was used for the statistical analysis with a level of significance of 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean central pulse pressure values of patients with MCI were significantly ( = 0.016) higher than those of the patients without MCI. There was a weak negative correlation between central pulse pressure and the results from the MoCA and MMSE ( = -0.283, = 0.017 and = -0.241, = 0.044, respectively). There was a correlation between ABPM and MCI as well as between HMBP and MCI.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation of central BP with target organ damage (MCI) is as good as for the other types of measurements of BP (home and ambulatory). Office BP seems to be the poorest marker for the assessment of target organ damage.

摘要

目的

我们比较了中心血压(BP)、动态血压监测(ABPM)、家庭自测血压(HMBP)和诊室血压测量作为轻度认知障碍(MCI)发生风险标志物的作用。

方法

对70例接受联合药物治疗的高血压患者进行了研究。他们的平均年龄为64.97±8.88岁。其中18例(25.71%)为男性,52例(74.28%)为女性。所有患者均接受了全面的体格检查、实验室筛查、超声心动图检查以及诊室、动态、家庭和中心血压测量。所使用的神经心理学测试包括:简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)。使用SPSS 19进行统计分析,显著性水平为0.05。

结果

MCI患者的平均中心脉压值显著高于( = 0.016)无MCI的患者。中心脉压与MoCA和MMSE结果之间存在弱负相关(分别为 = -0.283, = 0.017和 = -0.241, = 0.044)。ABPM与MCI之间以及HMBP与MCI之间均存在相关性。

结论

中心血压与靶器官损害(MCI)的相关性与其他类型的血压测量(家庭和动态)相当。诊室血压似乎是评估靶器官损害最差的标志物。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Central, Ambulatory, Home and Office Blood Pressure Measurement as Risk Markers for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Hypertensive Patients.高血压患者中,中心血压、动态血压、家庭血压及诊室血压测量作为轻度认知障碍风险标志物的比较
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2017 Aug 29;7(2):274-282. doi: 10.1159/000479365. eCollection 2017 May-Aug.
2
Pulse pressure and mild cognitive impairment.脉压与轻度认知障碍。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Nov;13(11):735-40. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328357ba78.
3
Screening for mild cognitive impairment in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.对具有心血管危险因素的患者进行轻度认知障碍筛查。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Dec 5;13:2925-2934. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S144264. eCollection 2017.
4
Home blood pressure is as reliable as ambulatory blood pressure in predicting target-organ damage in hypertension.在家测量血压在预测高血压患者的靶器官损害方面与动态血压监测同样可靠。
Am J Hypertens. 2007 Jun;20(6):616-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.12.013.
5
[Home self-measurements of blood pressure and relationship with diagnosis of hypertension and target organ damage: comparative study with ambulatory monitoring].[家庭自测血压及其与高血压诊断和靶器官损害的关系:与动态血压监测的比较研究]
Med Clin (Barc). 2000 Dec 2;115(19):730-5.
6
Home versus ambulatory and office blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.家庭血压与动态血压和诊室血压在预测高血压靶器官损害中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hypertens. 2012 Jul;30(7):1289-99. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283531eaf.
7
Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis.在60岁以上人群的轻度认知障碍(MCI)检测中,蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)测试是否比简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)更适用?荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Pol. 2016 Oct 31;50(5):1039-1052. doi: 10.12740/PP/45368.
8
[2013 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recommendations for the diagnosis of adult hypertension, assessment of cardiovascular and other hypertension-associated risk, and attainment of therapeutic goals (summary). Joint recommendations from the International Society for Chronobiology (ISC), American Association of Medical Chronobiology and Chronotherapeutics (AAMCC), Spanish Society of Applied Chronobiology, Chronotherapy, and Vascular Risk (SECAC), Spanish Society of Atherosclerosis (SEA), and Romanian Society of Internal Medicine (RSIM)].[2013年动态血压监测在成人高血压诊断、心血管及其他高血压相关风险评估以及治疗目标达成方面的建议(摘要)。国际时间生物学学会(ISC)、美国医学时间生物学与时间治疗学协会(AAMCC)、西班牙应用时间生物学、时间治疗学与血管风险学会(SECAC)、西班牙动脉粥样硬化学会(SEA)以及罗马尼亚内科医学学会(RSIM)联合推荐]
Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2013 Apr-Jun;25(2):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arteri.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
9
10
Is the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BM) a better instrument than the Malay version of the Mini Mental State Examination (M-MMSE) in screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the elderly?马来西亚语版蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA-BM)是否比简易精神状态检查马来语版(M-MMSE)更适合用于筛查老年人的轻度认知障碍(MCI)?
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;55 Suppl 1:S70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.04.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the predictive synergy of red cell distribution width and peak morning home systolic blood pressure: a dual biomarker approach for cognitive risk stratification in hypertensive minor stroke.揭示红细胞分布宽度与清晨家庭收缩压峰值的预测协同作用:一种用于高血压性轻度卒中认知风险分层的双生物标志物方法
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 26;16:1637561. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1637561. eCollection 2025.
2
Primary Arterial Hypertension Associated with Cognitive Dysfunction in Young Adults: Results from a Cross-Sectional Controlled Study.青年原发性高血压与认知功能障碍:一项横断面对照研究的结果
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 12;14(4):321. doi: 10.3390/bs14040321.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid intima-media thickness is associated with cognitive deficiency in hypertensive patients with elevated central systolic blood pressure.颈动脉内膜中层厚度与中心收缩压升高的高血压患者的认知缺陷有关。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012 Oct 18;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-41.
2
Pulse pressure and mild cognitive impairment.脉压与轻度认知障碍。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Nov;13(11):735-40. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328357ba78.
3
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).
《欧洲临床实践心血管疾病预防指南》(2012年版)。欧洲心脏病学会及其他学会心血管疾病预防临床实践联合工作组第五版(由九个学会的代表及特邀专家组成)。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(13):1635-701. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092. Epub 2012 May 3.
4
Vascular stiffness and increased pulse pressure in the aging cardiovascular system.衰老的心血管系统中的血管僵硬和脉搏压升高。
Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:263585. doi: 10.4061/2011/263585. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
5
Central blood pressure estimation for the masses moves a step closer.面向大众的中心血压估计又向前迈进了一步。
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Aug;24(8):495-7. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.47. Epub 2010 May 6.
6
High central pulse pressure is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome the strong heart study.高中心脉压与不良心血管结局独立相关——强心研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 27;54(18):1730-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.070.
7
Central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes.中心主动脉压与临床结局。
J Hypertens. 2009 Jun;27(6):1123-5. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32832b6566.
8
Central blood pressure and hypertension: role in cardiovascular risk assessment.中心血压与高血压:在心血管风险评估中的作用
Clin Sci (Lond). 2009 Feb;116(4):273-82. doi: 10.1042/CS20080072.
9
Central blood pressure measurement may improve risk stratification.中心血压测量可能会改善风险分层。
J Hum Hypertens. 2008 Dec;22(12):838-44. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.71. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
10
Central blood pressure measurements and antihypertensive therapy: a consensus document.中心血压测量与抗高血压治疗:一份共识文件。
Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):154-60. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.090068. Epub 2007 Jun 11.