Santos Simone Machado, Silva Maisa Mendonça, Melo Renata Maciel, Gavazza Savia, Florencio Lourdinha, Kato Mario T
Technology Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Rodovia BR 104, km 62, Nova Caruaru, Caruaru, PE, CEP 55002-960, Brazil.
Civil Engineering Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235, Recife, PE, CEP 50670-901, Brazil.
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Oct 15;189(11):561. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6283-x.
The decision-making process involved in municipal solid waste management (MSWM) must consider more than just financial aspects, which makes it a difficult task in developing countries. The Recife Metropolitan Region (RMR) in the Northeast of Brazil faces a MSWM problem that has been ongoing since the 1970s, with no common solution. In order to direct short-term solutions, three MSWM alternatives were outlined for the RMR, considering the current and future situations, the time and cost involved and social/environmental criteria. A multi-criteria approach, based on the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), was proposed to rank these alternatives. The alternative that included two private landfill sites and seven transfer, sorting and composting stations was confirmed as the most suitable and stable option for short-term MSWM, considering the two scenarios for the criteria weights. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to support the robustness of the results. The implementation of separate collections would minimize the amount of waste buried, while maximizing the useful life of landfill sites and increasing the timeframe of the alternative. Overall, the multi-criteria analysis was helpful and accurate during the alternative selection process, considering the similarities and restrictions of each option, which can lead to difficulties during the decision-making process.
城市固体废物管理(MSWM)中的决策过程必须考虑的不仅仅是财务方面,这使得它在发展中国家是一项艰巨的任务。巴西东北部的累西腓大都市区(RMR)面临着自20世纪70年代以来一直存在的城市固体废物管理问题,且没有通用的解决方案。为了指导短期解决方案,考虑到当前和未来的情况、所涉及的时间和成本以及社会/环境标准,为RMR概述了三种城市固体废物管理替代方案。提出了一种基于偏好排序组织法进行富集评估(PROMETHEE)的多标准方法来对这些替代方案进行排名。考虑到标准权重的两种情况,包括两个私人垃圾填埋场和七个转运、分类及堆肥站的替代方案被确认为短期城市固体废物管理最合适和稳定的选择。还进行了敏感性分析以支持结果的稳健性。实施分类收集将最大限度地减少掩埋的废物量,同时最大限度地延长垃圾填埋场的使用寿命并延长替代方案的时间范围。总体而言,考虑到每个选项的相似性和限制,多标准分析在替代方案选择过程中是有帮助且准确的,而这些相似性和限制可能会在决策过程中导致困难。