Soltani Atousa, Hewage Kasun, Reza Bahareh, Sadiq Rehan
School of Engineering (Okanagan Campus), University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
School of Engineering (Okanagan Campus), University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Waste Manag. 2015 Jan;35:318-28. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) is a complicated process that involves multiple environmental and socio-economic criteria. Decision-makers look for decision support frameworks that can guide in defining alternatives, relevant criteria and their weights, and finding a suitable solution. In addition, decision-making in MSWM problems such as finding proper waste treatment locations or strategies often requires multiple stakeholders such as government, municipalities, industries, experts, and/or general public to get involved. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is the most popular framework employed in previous studies on MSWM; MCDA methods help multiple stakeholders evaluate the often conflicting criteria, communicate their different preferences, and rank or prioritize MSWM strategies to finally agree on some elements of these strategies and make an applicable decision. This paper reviews and brings together research on the application of MCDA for solving MSWM problems with more focus on the studies that have considered multiple stakeholders and offers solutions for such problems. Results of this study show that AHP is the most common approach in consideration of multiple stakeholders and experts and governments/municipalities are the most common participants in these studies.
城市固体废弃物管理(MSWM)是一个复杂的过程,涉及多个环境和社会经济标准。决策者寻求能够指导定义备选方案、相关标准及其权重,并找到合适解决方案的决策支持框架。此外,在MSWM问题中进行决策,如寻找合适的废物处理地点或策略,通常需要多个利益相关者参与,如政府、市政当局、行业、专家和/或公众。多标准决策分析(MCDA)是先前MSWM研究中最常用的框架;MCDA方法帮助多个利益相关者评估常常相互冲突的标准,传达他们不同的偏好,并对MSWM策略进行排序或确定优先级,最终就这些策略的某些要素达成一致并做出适用的决策。本文回顾并汇总了关于应用MCDA解决MSWM问题的研究,更侧重于考虑多个利益相关者的研究,并针对此类问题提供解决方案。本研究结果表明,层次分析法(AHP)是考虑多个利益相关者和专家时最常用的方法,而政府/市政当局是这些研究中最常见的参与者。