Mamadou Mbaye Elhadji, Kone Souleymane, Kâ Ousseynou, Mboup Souleymane
Sante Publique. 2017 Oct 2;29(4):487-496. doi: 10.3917/spub.174.0487.
Community engagement is one of the most effective approaches to the fight against Ebola. It has been shown to be effective in other contexts and was implemented in Guinea for two years to reduce the spread of the Ebola Outbreak.
This article is based on a qualitative approach combining several data collection methods over a nine-month period in the field : series of formal and informal interviews, participating observations, focus groups, comment meetings, analysis of reports and follow-up of news on the Ebola Outbreak. These methods are designed to more effectively describe community engagement in the fight against Ebola in Guinea.
Communities were initially subjected to coercive methods of prevention and control of Ebola and were stigmatized. This context subsequently led to two forms of resistance from communities in relation to the actors of prevention : passive and active resistance. The course of the epidemic and the determination of the mediators finally succeeded in involving the communities in the fight against Ebola, which therefore effectively contributed to the end of the epidemic.
These results demonstrate that, as during other epidemics and in other contexts, communities are not passive stakeholders in the fight against Ebola. They can be actively involved based on their knowledge, but also the attitudes of other actors involved in the fight against VME.
社区参与是抗击埃博拉最有效的方法之一。在其他情况下已证明其有效,并且在几内亚实施了两年以减少埃博拉疫情的传播。
本文基于一种定性方法,在九个月的实地考察期间结合了多种数据收集方法:一系列正式和非正式访谈、参与观察、焦点小组、评论会议、报告分析以及埃博拉疫情新闻追踪。这些方法旨在更有效地描述几内亚社区在抗击埃博拉中的参与情况。
社区最初遭受了埃博拉防控的强制方法并受到污名化。这种情况随后导致社区针对预防行动者产生了两种形式的抵抗:被动抵抗和主动抵抗。疫情的发展过程以及调解者的决心最终成功促使社区参与到抗击埃博拉的行动中,从而有效地促成了疫情的结束。
这些结果表明,与其他疫情及其他情况一样,在抗击埃博拉的斗争中,社区并非被动的利益相关者。基于他们的知识以及其他参与抗击病毒性出血热行动者的态度,他们能够积极参与其中。