Suppr超能文献

加强非洲卫生技术评估和确定优先事项的专业能力。

Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa.

作者信息

Doherty Jane E, Wilkinson Thomas, Edoka Ijeoma, Hofman Karen

机构信息

a School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Parktown , Johannesburg , South Africa.

b PRICELESS SA (Priority Cost-Effective Lessons for Systems Strengthening South Africa), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Parktown , Johannesburg , South Africa.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1370194. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting.

OBJECTIVE

On the basis of international  lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa.

METHODS

A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. 'Capacity' was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers.

RESULTS

Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage.

摘要

背景

实现可持续的全民健康覆盖在一定程度上取决于公平的优先事项设定过程,该过程可确保各国明智地使用稀缺资源。虽然非洲存在一般的卫生经济能力建设举措,但对培养个人、机构和网络运用经济评估来支持卫生技术评估和有效优先事项设定的能力关注较少。

目的

基于国际经验,确定研究组织和伙伴关系如何能够促进非洲卫生技术评估和优先事项设定方面的能力建设。

方法

对国际正式和灰色文献进行了快速检索,并从两个与卫生技术评估能力建设相关的国际和区域研讨会的审议中提取经验教训。“能力”的定义较为宽泛,包括有利的政治环境、推动优先事项设定的强大公共机构能力、专家之间有效的网络联系、强大的研究组织和熟练的研究人员。

结果

有效的优先事项设定需要的不仅仅是高质量的经济研究。研究人员必须与一系列利益相关者互动,与其他研究组织紧密建立网络联系,与不同层级的政府建立伙伴关系,并培训下一代研究人员和政策制定者。在很少有政府单位或机构专门负责卫生技术评估的低收入和中等收入国家,他们还必须支持制定一个对社会和政府需求及优先事项敏感的有效优先事项设定过程。

结论

研究组织在促进卫生技术评估和优先事项设定能力的发展方面可发挥重要作用。在面临资源和能力挑战的非洲,当地和国际研究人员之间以及与关键政府利益相关者之间的有效伙伴关系,可以利用现有技能和知识,培养足够数量的个人和机构。这些将有助于满足非洲国家的优先事项设定需求,并为可持续的全民健康覆盖做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa.
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1370194. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194.
5
7
Introducing health technology assessment in Tanzania.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):80-86. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000588. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
9
The role of insurance in the achievement of universal coverage within a developing country context: South Africa as a case study.
BMC Public Health. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-S1-S5. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Suitability of paediatric legislation beyond the USA and Europe: a qualitative study on access to paediatric medicines.
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;2(1):e000264. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000264. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Health technology assessment capacity to support Zambia's health benefits package reform policy.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 28;41(1):e15. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325000030.
3
A New eHealth Investment Appraisal Framework for Africa: Validation.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;20(14):6426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146426.
4
A SWOT analysis of the development of health technology assessment in Iran.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283663. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessing the potential of HTA to inform resource allocation decisions in low-income settings: The case of Malawi.
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:1010702. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1010702. eCollection 2022.
6
Developing a tool to assess the skills to perform a health technology assessment.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01562-4.
7
EHealth Investment Appraisal in Africa: A Scoping Review.
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059999. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059999.
8
Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 7;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00293-5.
9
Costs of implementing community-based intervention for HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 5;2(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00177-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Capacity Building for HTA Implementation in Middle-Income Countries: The Case of Hungary.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2013 Sep-Oct;2(2):264-266. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
2
Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage.
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):462-7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.155721. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Priority-setting institutions in health: recommendations from a center for global development working group.
Glob Heart. 2012 Mar;7(1):13-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
6
Using health technology assessment for informing coverage decisions in Thailand.
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Mar;1(2):137-46. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.10.
7
NICE's social value judgements about equity in health and health care.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2013 Apr;8(2):145-65. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000096. Epub 2012 May 1.
8
Approaches to developing the capacity of health policy analysis institutes: a comparative case study.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Mar 5;10:7. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验