J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Mar 1;28(3):278-282. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0189. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
Studies developed the frail elderly handgrip strength (HGS) diagnostic criteria using multiple types of handgrip dynamometers. If different handgrip dynamometers report different values, then this would have the potential to misclassify people into the wrong diagnostic category.
To examine the characteristics of HGS measured by 2 standard handgrip dynamometers and to investigate the influence of hand size on HGS.
University research laboratory.
A total of 87 young and middle-aged adults between the ages of 20 and 60 years participated in this study.
Standard methods of HGS measurements were used for hydraulic and Smedley spring-type dynamometers, although the participants were instructed to maintain an upright standing position in both tests.
Test-retest reliability of hydraulic and Smedley dynamometers provided comparable results to that observed with previous studies. However, the difference in HGS between the 2 dynamometers (Hydraulic-Smedley difference) was positively associated (r = .670, P < .001) with the mean of the 2 dynamometers. The participants who had relatively low HGS (at least <35 kg) produced similar HGS values when the 2 dynamometers were compared, whereas persons who had relatively higher HGS (at least >45 kg) produced greater strength values with the hydraulic compared with the Smedley. The hand and palm lengths were weakly correlated (r = .349 and r = .358, respectively, both Ps < .001) with the difference in HGS between the 2 dynamometers.
Test-retest reliability of hydraulic and Smedley dynamometers provides comparable results to previous studies. However, the difference in HGS between the 2 dynamometers was positively associated with the mean of the 2 dynamometers. This Hydraulic-Smedley difference would not affect persons who have relatively low HGS (at least <35 kg), while when HGS is relatively high, the comparison between dynamometers should be done with caution.
多项握力计研究制定了虚弱老年人握力(HGS)的诊断标准。如果不同的握力计报告不同的值,那么这可能会导致错误地将人们归入错误的诊断类别。
检查两种标准握力计测量的 HGS 的特征,并研究手的大小对 HGS 的影响。
大学研究实验室。
共有 87 名年龄在 20 岁至 60 岁之间的年轻和中年成年人参加了这项研究。
使用液压和 Smedley 弹簧式测力计进行标准 HGS 测量方法,尽管在两项测试中均要求参与者保持直立站立姿势。
液压和 Smedley 测力计的测试-重测可靠性与之前研究中观察到的结果相当。然而,两种测力计之间的 HGS 差异(液压-Smedley 差异)与两种测力计的平均值呈正相关(r = .670,P < .001)。当比较两种测力计时,相对较低 HGS(至少 <35 kg)的参与者产生相似的 HGS 值,而相对较高 HGS(至少 >45 kg)的人使用液压测力计产生的强度值大于 Smedley 测力计。手和手掌长度与两种测力计之间 HGS 的差异呈弱相关(r = .349 和 r = .358,均 P < .001)。
液压和 Smedley 测力计的测试-重测可靠性与之前的研究提供了可比的结果。然而,两种测力计之间的 HGS 差异与两种测力计的平均值呈正相关。这种液压-Smedley 差异不会影响相对较低 HGS(至少 <35 kg)的人,而当 HGS 较高时,应谨慎比较测力计。