Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, AUSTRALIA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Mar;50(3):393-399. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001454.
The presence of bone metastases has excluded participation of cancer patients in exercise interventions and is a relative contraindication to supervised exercise in the community setting because of concerns of fragility fracture. We examined the efficacy and safety of a modular multimodal exercise program in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.
Between 2012 and 2015, 57 prostate cancer patients (70.0 ± 8.4 yr; body mass index, 28.7 ± 4.0 kg·m) with bone metastases (pelvis, 75.4%; femur, 40.4%; rib/thoracic spine, 66.7%; lumbar spine, 43.9%; humerus, 24.6%; other sites, 70.2%) were randomized to multimodal supervised aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises undertaken thrice weekly (EX; n = 28) or usual care (CON; n = 29) for 3 months. Physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 was the primary end point as an indicator of patient-rated physical functioning. Secondary end points included objective measures of physical function, lower body muscle strength, body composition, and fatigue. Safety was assessed by recording the incidence and severity of any adverse events, skeletal complications, and bone pain throughout the intervention.
There was a significant difference between groups for self-reported physical functioning (3.2 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-6.0 points; P = 0.028) and lower body muscle strength (6.6 kg; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-12.7; P = 0.033) at 3 months favoring EX. However, there was no difference between groups for lean mass (P = 0.584), fat mass (P = 0.598), or fatigue (P = 0.964). There were no exercise-related adverse events or skeletal fractures and no differences in bone pain between EX and CON (P = 0.507).
Multimodal modular exercise in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases led to self-reported improvements in physical function and objectively measured lower body muscle strength with no skeletal complications or increased bone pain.
ACTRN12611001158954.
存在骨转移使癌症患者无法参与运动干预,且由于担心脆性骨折,社区监督下的运动也成为相对禁忌。我们研究了多模式模块化运动方案对有骨转移的前列腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。
2012 年至 2015 年,57 例前列腺癌患者(70.0 ± 8.4 岁;体重指数,28.7 ± 4.0 kg·m)存在骨转移(骨盆,75.4%;股骨,40.4%;肋骨/胸椎,66.7%;腰椎,43.9%;肱骨,24.6%;其他部位,70.2%),随机分为多模式监督有氧运动、阻力运动和灵活性运动组(EX 组,n = 28)或常规治疗组(CON 组,n = 29),每周 3 次,共 3 个月。医疗结局研究 36 项简短健康调查简表的身体功能子量表是主要终点,作为患者自评身体功能的指标。次要终点包括身体功能的客观测量、下肢肌肉力量、身体成分和疲劳。通过记录整个干预过程中任何不良事件、骨骼并发症和骨痛的发生率和严重程度来评估安全性。
EX 组在自我报告的身体功能(3.2 分;95%置信区间,0.4-6.0 分;P = 0.028)和下肢肌肉力量(6.6 kg;95%置信区间,0.6-12.7;P = 0.033)方面与 CON 组有显著差异。然而,两组间瘦体重(P = 0.584)、体脂(P = 0.598)或疲劳(P = 0.964)无差异。没有与运动相关的不良事件或骨骼骨折,EX 组与 CON 组的骨痛无差异(P = 0.507)。
多模式模块化运动方案可改善前列腺癌伴骨转移患者的身体功能和客观测量的下肢肌肉力量,无骨骼并发症或骨痛增加。
ACTRN12611001158954。