Hinsley Amy, Sutherland William J, Johnston Alison
Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Kent, United Kingdom.
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 16;12(10):e0185534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185534. eCollection 2017.
Gender inequity in science and academia, especially in senior positions, is a recognised problem. The reasons are poorly understood, but include the persistence of historical gender ratios, discrimination and other factors, including gender-based behavioural differences. We studied participation in a professional context by observing question-asking behaviour at a large international conference with a clear equality code of conduct that prohibited any form of discrimination. Accounting for audience gender ratio, male attendees asked 1.8 questions for each question asked by a female attendee. Amongst only younger researchers, male attendees also asked 1.8 questions per female question, suggesting the pattern cannot be attributed to the temporary problem of demographic inertia. We link our findings to the 'chilly' climate for women in STEM, including wider experiences of discrimination likely encountered by women throughout their education and careers. We call for a broader and coordinated approach to understanding and addressing the barriers to women and other under-represented groups. We encourage the scientific community to recognise the context in which these gender differences occur, and evaluate and develop methods to support full participation from all attendees.
科学和学术界存在性别不平等问题,尤其是在高级职位方面,这是一个公认的问题。其原因尚不清楚,但包括历史性别比例的持续存在、歧视以及其他因素,包括基于性别的行为差异。我们通过观察一个大型国际会议上的提问行为来研究专业背景下的参与情况,该会议有明确的平等行为准则,禁止任何形式的歧视。考虑到观众的性别比例,男性与会者每提出一个问题,女性与会者会提出1.8个问题。仅在年轻研究人员中,男性与会者每提出一个女性问题,也会提出1.8个问题,这表明这种模式不能归因于人口惯性这一暂时问题。我们将我们的研究结果与STEM领域中女性所处的“寒冷”环境联系起来,包括女性在整个教育和职业生涯中可能遇到的更广泛的歧视经历。我们呼吁采取更广泛、协调的方法来理解和消除阻碍女性及其他代表性不足群体的障碍。我们鼓励科学界认识到这些性别差异出现的背景,并评估和开发方法以支持所有与会者充分参与。