Scott Rachel H, Bajos Nathalie, Slaymaker Emma, Wellings Kaye, Mercer Catherine H
Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Gender, Health and Sexuality, INSERM, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 16;12(10):e0186412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186412. eCollection 2017.
Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this using contemporaneous national probability survey data from Britain and France.
Data were analysed for 17-29 year-olds in Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, n = 5959) undertaken 2010-2012, and the 2010 French Fertility, Contraception and Sexual Dysfunction survey (FECOND, n = 3027). For each country, we estimated the gender-specific prevalence of sex before-16, contraceptive-use, conception before-20, and abortion in the event of conception, and used logistic regression to examine associations between two measures of socioeconomic status-educational-level and parental socioeconomic-group-and each outcome. We tested for interactions between socioeconomic characteristics and country, and socioeconomic characteristics and gender, for each outcome.
For each outcome, Britain and France differed with regard to prevalence but associations with socioeconomic characteristics were similar. Respondents of higher educational level, and, less consistently, with parents from higher socioeconomic-groups, were less likely to report sex before-16 (Britain, men: adjusted OR (aOR) 0.5, women: aOR 0.5; France, men: aOR 0.5, women: aOR 0.5), no contraception at first sex (Britain, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.6; France, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.4), pregnancy before-20 (Britain: aOR 0.3; France: aOR 0.1), and in Britain, a birth rather than an abortion in the event of conception (Britain: aOR 3.1). We found no strong evidence of variation in the magnitude of the associations with socioeconomic characteristics by country or gender.
Population level differences in conception and abortion rates between the two countries may partly be driven by the larger proportion of the population that is disadvantaged in Britain. This research highlights the role intra-country comparisons can play in understanding young people's sexual and reproductive behaviours.
社会经济地位已被证明与年轻人的性行为、避孕措施使用、怀孕和堕胎有关。对于这种关联的强度在不同结果、男女之间或跨国之间是否存在差异,人们了解得较少。我们使用来自英国和法国的同期全国概率调查数据对此进行调查。
对英国2010 - 2012年进行的第三次全国性态度与生活方式调查(Natsal - 3,n = 5959)中17 - 29岁的人群,以及2010年法国生育、避孕与性功能障碍调查(FECOND,n = 3027)的数据进行分析。对于每个国家,我们估计了16岁前性行为、避孕措施使用、20岁前怀孕以及怀孕后堕胎的特定性别患病率,并使用逻辑回归来检验社会经济地位的两个衡量指标——教育水平和父母社会经济群体——与每个结果之间的关联。我们针对每个结果测试了社会经济特征与国家之间以及社会经济特征与性别之间的相互作用。
对于每个结果,英国和法国在患病率方面存在差异,但与社会经济特征的关联相似。教育水平较高的受访者,以及父母来自较高社会经济群体的受访者(不太一致),报告16岁前性行为的可能性较小(英国,男性:调整后的比值比(aOR)0.5,女性:aOR 0.5;法国,男性:aOR 0.5,女性:aOR 0.5),首次性行为时未采取避孕措施的可能性较小(英国,男性:aOR 0.4,女性:aOR 0.6;法国,男性:aOR 0.4,女性:aOR 0.4),20岁前怀孕的可能性较小(英国:aOR 0.3;法国:aOR 0.1),并且在英国,如果怀孕,生育而非堕胎的可能性较大(英国:aOR 3.1)。我们没有发现有力证据表明与社会经济特征的关联强度在国家或性别之间存在差异。
两国在怀孕和堕胎率方面的人口水平差异可能部分是由英国处于不利地位的人口比例较大所驱动的。这项研究突出了国内比较在理解年轻人的性和生殖行为方面可以发挥的作用。