• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group.

出版信息

Lancet. 1986 Jul 12;2(8498):57-66.

PMID:2873379
Abstract

Between mid-1981 and Jan 1, 1985, 16 027 patients entering 245 coronary care units at a mean of 5.0 h after the onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction were randomised either to a control group or to a group receiving atenolol (5-10 mg iv immediately, followed by 100 mg/day orally for 7 days). Vascular mortality during the treatment period (days 0-7) was significantly lower (2p less than 0.4) in the treated group, 313/8037 (3.89%) versus 365/7990 (4.57%), but this 15% difference has wide 95% confidence limits (from about zero to about a quarter). No subgroups were identified in which the proportional difference in days 0-7 was clearly better, or clearly worse, than 15%. After the treatment period, there was only a slight further divergence (691 vs 703 additional vascular deaths by Jan 1, 1985). Thus, overall vascular mortality was significantly lower in the atenolol group at one year (life-table estimates: 10.7% atenolol vs 12.0% control; 2p less than 0.01) but not at Jan 1, 1985 (crude percentages: 12.5% vs 13.4%; 2p less than 0.07). However, atenolol patients were more likely than controls to be discharged on beta-blockers, which can account for much of the additional difference in vascular mortality after day 7. Immediate beta-blockade increased the extent of inotropic drug use (5.0% vs 3.4%, 2p less than 0.0001), chiefly on days 0-1, but despite this most of the improvement in vascular mortality was seen during days 0-1 (121 vs 171 deaths). Treatment did not appear to decrease the number in whom cardiac enzymes rose to above twice the local upper limit of normal. Slightly fewer non-fatal cardiac arrests (189 vs 198) and reinfarctions (148 vs 161) were recorded in the atenolol group, neither difference being significant. Systematic review of fatal and of non-fatal events in ISIS-1 and in all other randomised trials of iv beta-blockade reinforces the suggestion that treatment reduces mortality in the first week by about 15%, but with a rather less extreme effect in days 0-1 than was observed in ISIS-1 alone. It also provides highly significant (2p less than 0.0002) evidence of an effect on the combined end-point of death, arrest, or reinfarction, suggesting that treatment of about 200 patients would lead to the avoidance of 1 reinfarction, 1 arrest, and 1 death during days 0-7. ISIS-1 suggests these early gains will persist.

摘要

相似文献

1
Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group.
Lancet. 1986 Jul 12;2(8498):57-66.
2
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者并用或两者均不用的随机试验:ISIS-2。ISIS-2(第二次心肌梗死存活国际研究)协作组
Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):349-60.
3
Mechanisms for the early mortality reduction produced by beta-blockade started early in acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. ISIS-1 (First International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.
Lancet. 1988 Apr 23;1(8591):921-3.
4
ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41,299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-3 (Third International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.ISIS-3研究:在41299例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中,对链激酶、组织型纤溶酶原激活剂、茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物进行随机比较,并对阿司匹林加肝素与单用阿司匹林进行比较。ISIS-3(第三次国际心肌梗死生存研究)协作组
Lancet. 1992 Mar 28;339(8796):753-70.
5
Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者联用或两者均不用的随机试验:ISIS-2。ISIS-2(第二次心肌梗死生存国际研究)协作组
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Dec;12(6 Suppl A):3A-13A. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92635-6.
6
Beta blockade early in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死早期的β受体阻滞剂治疗
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jul 15;60(2):6A-10A. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90492-9.
7
Use of beta adrenoceptor blockade during and after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死期间及之后使用β肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂。
Annu Rev Med. 1986;37:415-25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.37.020186.002215.
8
ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.ISIS-4:一项随机析因试验,在58050例疑似急性心肌梗死患者中评估早期口服卡托普利、口服单硝酸酯和静脉注射硫酸镁。ISIS-4(第四次国际心肌梗死存活研究)协作组
Lancet. 1995 Mar 18;345(8951):669-85.
9
Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial.45852例急性心肌梗死患者早期静脉注射后口服美托洛尔:随机安慰剂对照试验
Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1622-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67661-1.
10
Early intravenous atenolol treatment in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Preliminary report of a randomised trial.疑似急性心肌梗死患者早期静脉注射阿替洛尔治疗。一项随机试验的初步报告。
Lancet. 1980 Aug 9;2(8189):273-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)90231-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term benefit of vasodilating beta-blockers in acute myocardial infarction patients with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.血管舒张性β受体阻滞剂对左心室射血分数轻度降低的急性心肌梗死患者的长期益处。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326516. eCollection 2025.
2
Continuation vs Withdrawal of Beta-Blockers and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction With Preserved Left Ventricular Function.心肌梗死后左心室功能保留患者β受体阻滞剂的继续使用与停用及预后
JACC Adv. 2025 May 22;4(6 Pt 1):101814. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101814.
3
Beta-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction.
心肌梗死后的β受体阻滞剂治疗
JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101582. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101582. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
Neurocardiology: translational advancements and potential.神经心脏病学:转化医学进展与潜力
J Physiol. 2025 Mar;603(7):1729-1779. doi: 10.1113/JP284740. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
5
Early initiation of oral beta-blocker improves long-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention.早期口服β受体阻滞剂可改善行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的长期生存。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04188-0.
6
Allopurinol versus Trimetazidine as Antianginal: A Randomized Clinical Trial.别嘌醇与曲美他嗪治疗心绞痛的对比:一项随机临床试验。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Aug;121(8):e20240500. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240500.
7
Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.大试验与小试验之间的一致性:系统评价和元研究分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32296.
8
Are Bleeding Events Valid as a Surrogate Endpoint for Mortality in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials?出血事件能否作为心血管临床试验中死亡率的替代终点?
JACC Adv. 2023 May 26;2(3):100335. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100335. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Beta-blocker therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: not all patients need it.急性心肌梗死患者的β受体阻滞剂治疗:并非所有患者都需要。
Acute Crit Care. 2023 Aug;38(3):251-260. doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.00955. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Term Maintenance Beta-Blocker Therapy After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Stable, Optimally Treated Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.稳定性、经优化治疗的行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死后患者长期维持β受体阻滞剂治疗的疗效比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Aug;12(15):e028976. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028976. Epub 2023 Jul 26.