Jupp P G, Cornel A J
Department of Virology, University of the Witwatersrand, Sandringham, South Africa.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1988 Mar;4(1):4-8.
Aedes juppi was readily infected by inoculation with virus but failed to transmit either horizontally or vertically. Seventy-five to 90% of the other 4 mosquito species became infected after ingesting 6.8-9.8 log10CPD50/ml of virus. These species all transmitted virus at the following rates on the post-infection days indicated: Aedes unidentatus (58%--day 11), Aedes dentatus (32%--day 11, 50%--day 18), Culex poicilipes (15%--day 15, 80%--day 30) and Aedes argenteopunctatus (14% on day 30). On the basis of these results and the relative prevalence of each species, it was concluded that Ae. unidentatus and Ae. dentatus are potential epizootic and possibly reservoir vectors and Cx. poicilipes a potential epizootic vector of Rift Valley fever virus in South Africa.
朱普伊伊蚊通过接种病毒很容易被感染,但无法进行水平或垂直传播。在摄入6.8 - 9.8 log10 CPD50/ml的病毒后,其他4种蚊子中有75%至90%被感染。这些蚊子在感染后的指定天数以以下比率传播病毒:未识别伊蚊(11天为58%)、齿缘伊蚊(11天为32%,18天为50%)、波氏库蚊(15天为15%,30天为80%)和银点伊蚊(30天为14%)。根据这些结果以及每个物种的相对流行程度,得出结论:未识别伊蚊和齿缘伊蚊是潜在的动物流行病和可能的储存宿主传播媒介,而波氏库蚊是南非裂谷热病毒的潜在动物流行病传播媒介。