Suppr超能文献

扫描电子显微镜下不同 Nd:YAG 和 Er:YAG 激光辐照条件下上釉二硅酸锂陶瓷的表面比较评估。

Scanning electron microscope comparative surface evaluation of glazed-lithium disilicate ceramics under different irradiation settings of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):75-81. doi: 10.2319/062017-408.1. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surface of glazed lithium disilicate dental ceramics after irradiation under different irradiation settings of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three glazed-press lithium disilicate ceramic discs were treated with HF, Er:YAG, and Nd:YAG, respectively. The laser-setting variables tested were laser mode, repetition rate (Hz), power (W), time of exposure (seconds), and laser energy (mJ). Sixteen different variable settings were tested for each laser type, and all the samples were analyzed by SEM at 500× and 1000× magnification.

RESULTS

Surface analysis of the HF-treated sample showed a typical surface texture with a homogenously rough pattern and exposed ceramic crystals. Er:YAG showed no effect on the surface under any irradiation setting. The surface of Nd:YAG-irradiated samples showed cracking, melting, and resolidifying of the ceramic glaze. These changes became more pronounced as the power increased. At the highest power setting (2.25 W), craters on the surface with large areas of melted or resolidified glaze surrounded by globules were visible. However, there was little to no exposure of ceramic crystals or visible regular surface roughening.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither Er:YAG nor Nd:YAG dental lasers exhibited adequate surface modification for bonding of orthodontic brackets on glazed lithium disilicate ceramics compared with the control treated with 9.5% HF.

摘要

目的

使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估不同 Nd:YAG 和 Er:YAG 激光辐照设置下上釉锂硅牙科陶瓷的表面。

材料和方法

分别用 HF、Er:YAG 和 Nd:YAG 处理三个上釉压力锂硅陶瓷圆盘。测试的激光设置变量为激光模式、重复率(Hz)、功率(W)、曝光时间(秒)和激光能量(mJ)。每种激光类型测试了 16 种不同的变量设置,所有样品均在 500×和 1000×放大倍数下用 SEM 进行分析。

结果

HF 处理样品的表面分析显示出典型的表面纹理,具有均匀粗糙的图案和暴露的陶瓷晶体。在任何辐照设置下,Er:YAG 对表面均无影响。Nd:YAG 辐照样品的表面出现开裂、熔化和陶瓷釉的再凝固。随着功率的增加,这些变化变得更加明显。在最高功率设置(2.25 W)下,表面上可见带有大面积熔化或再凝固釉的凹陷,周围有液滴。然而,几乎没有暴露陶瓷晶体或可见的规则表面粗糙化。

结论

与用 9.5% HF 处理的对照相比,Er:YAG 和 Nd:YAG 牙科激光均未对上釉锂硅陶瓷进行足够的表面改性,以用于粘接正畸托槽。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a systematic review.正畸粘结至瓷质材料:一项系统评价
Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):555-60. doi: 10.2319/083013-636.1. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验