Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186647. eCollection 2017.
Changes in dermoscopic patterns of naevi may be associated with melanoma; however, there is no consensus on which dermoscopic classification system is optimal. To determine whether different classification systems give comparable results and can be combined for analysis, we applied two systems to a case-control study of melanoma with 1037 participants: 573 classified using a "1/3 major feature" system, 464 classified based on rules of appearance, and 263 classified with both criteria. There was strong correlation for non-specific (Spearman R = 0.96) and reticular (Spearman R = 0.82) naevi, with a slight bias for globular naevi with the rules of appearance system. Inter-observer reliability was high for the rules of appearance system, particularly for reticular naevi (Pearson >0.97). We show that different classification systems for naevi can be combined for data analysis, and describe a method for determining what adjustments may need to be applied to combine data sets.
痣的皮肤镜模式变化可能与黑色素瘤有关;然而,哪种皮肤镜分类系统最佳尚没有共识。为了确定不同的分类系统是否能给出可比的结果并可合并进行分析,我们对一项有 1037 名参与者的黑色素瘤病例对照研究应用了两种系统:573 名用“1/3 主要特征”系统分类,464 名根据出现规则分类,263 名用两种标准分类。非特异性(Spearman R = 0.96)和网状(Spearman R = 0.82)痣的相关性很强,而规则系统的球状痣有轻微偏差。出现规则系统的观察者间可靠性很高,尤其是网状痣(Pearson >0.97)。我们表明,不同的痣分类系统可合并用于数据分析,并描述了一种确定需要进行哪些调整以合并数据集的方法。