UNC Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Graduate Group in Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186651. eCollection 2017.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently released a five star rating system as part of 'Dialysis Facility Compare' to help patients identify and choose high performing clinics in the US. Eight dialysis-related measures determine ratings. Little is known about the association between surrounding community sociodemographic characteristics and star ratings. Using data from the U.S. Census and over 6000 dialysis clinics across the country, we examined the association between dialysis clinic star ratings and characteristics of the local population: 1) proportion of population below the federal poverty level (FPL); 2) proportion of black individuals; and 3) proportion of Hispanic individuals, by correlation and regression analyses. Secondary analyses with Quality Incentive Program (QIP) scores and population characteristics were also performed. We observed a negligible correlation between star ratings and the proportion of local individuals below FPL; Spearman coefficient, R = -0.09 (p<0.0001), and a stronger correlation between star ratings and the proportion of black individuals; R = -0.21 (p<0.0001). Ordered logistic regression analyses yielded adjusted odds ratio of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [0.80-1.30], p = 0.12) and 0.55 ([0.48-0.63], p<0.0001) for high vs. low level of proportion below FPL and proportion of black individuals, respectively. In contrast, a near-zero correlation was observed between star ratings and the proportion of Hispanic individuals. Correlations varied substantially by country region, clinic profit status and clinic size. Analyses using clinic QIP scores provided similar results. Sociodemographic characteristics of the surrounding community, factors typically outside of providers' direct control, have varying levels of association with clinic dialysis star ratings.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心最近发布了一项五星级评级系统,作为“透析机构比较”的一部分,以帮助患者在美国识别和选择表现出色的诊所。八项与透析相关的指标决定了评级。关于周围社区社会人口特征与星级评分之间的关系知之甚少。利用美国人口普查数据和全国 6000 多家透析诊所的数据,我们通过相关分析和回归分析,研究了透析诊所星级评分与当地人口特征之间的关系:1)处于联邦贫困线以下的人口比例(FPL);2)黑人比例;3)西班牙裔比例。还进行了与质量激励计划(QIP)评分和人口特征的二次分析。我们观察到星级评分与当地处于 FPL 以下的个人比例之间存在微不足道的相关性;Spearman 系数,R = -0.09(p<0.0001),以及星级评分与黑人比例之间的相关性更强;R = -0.21(p<0.0001)。有序逻辑回归分析得出了调整后的优势比,对于 FPL 以下比例和黑人比例的高低水平,分别为 0.91(95%置信区间[0.80-1.30],p = 0.12)和 0.55([0.48-0.63],p<0.0001)。相比之下,星级评分与西班牙裔比例之间的相关性几乎为零。相关性因国家地区、诊所盈利状况和诊所规模而有很大差异。使用诊所 QIP 评分的分析提供了类似的结果。周围社区的社会人口特征是提供者通常无法直接控制的因素,与诊所的透析星级评分有不同程度的关联。