Suppr超能文献

基于网络的脑刺激选择性地损害空间检索。

Network-based brain stimulation selectively impairs spatial retrieval.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan-Feb;11(1):213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct brain stimulation via electrodes implanted for intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) permits the modulation of endogenous electrical signals with significantly greater spatial and temporal specificity than non-invasive approaches. It also allows for the stimulation of deep brain structures important to memory, such as the hippocampus, that are difficult, if not impossible, to target non-invasively. Direct stimulation studies of these deep memory structures, though, have produced mixed results, with some reporting improvement, some impairment, and others, no consistent changes.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that to modulate cognitive function using brain stimulation, it is essential to modulate connected nodes comprising a network, rather than just alter local activity.

METHODS

iEEG data collected while patients performed a spatiotemporal memory retrieval task were used to map frequency-specific, coherent oscillatory activity between different brain regions associated with successful memory retrieval. We used these to identify two target nodes that exhibited selectively stronger coupling for spatial vs. temporal retrieval. In a subsequent session, electrical stimulation - theta-bursts with a fixed phase-lag (0° or 180°) - was applied to the two target regions while patients performed spatiotemporal retrieval.

RESULTS

Stimulation selectively impaired spatial retrieval while not affecting temporal retrieval, and this selective impairment was associated with theta decoupling of the spatial retrieval network.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that stimulating tightly connected nodes in a functional network at the appropriate phase-lag may effectively modulate the network function, and while in this case it impaired memory processes, it sets a foundation for further network-based perturbation studies.

摘要

背景

通过植入颅内脑电图(iEEG)的电极进行直接脑刺激,允许以比非侵入性方法更高的空间和时间特异性来调节内源性电信号。它还允许刺激对记忆很重要的深部脑结构,如海马体,这些结构如果不是不可能的话,也很难通过非侵入性方法进行靶向。然而,这些深部记忆结构的直接刺激研究产生了混合的结果,有些报告改善,有些报告损害,有些则没有一致的变化。

目的/假设:我们假设,要使用脑刺激调节认知功能,调节构成网络的连接节点是至关重要的,而不仅仅是改变局部活动。

方法

在患者执行时空记忆检索任务时收集的 iEEG 数据用于绘制与成功记忆检索相关的不同大脑区域之间的特定频率、相干的振荡活动。我们使用这些来识别两个目标节点,它们在空间与时间检索方面表现出选择性更强的耦合。在随后的一次会议中,当患者执行时空检索时,向两个目标区域施加电刺激 - 具有固定相移(0°或 180°)的θ突发。

结果

刺激选择性地损害了空间检索,而不影响时间检索,并且这种选择性损害与空间检索网络的θ去耦相关。

结论

这些发现表明,以适当的相移刺激功能网络中紧密连接的节点可能有效地调节网络功能,虽然在这种情况下它损害了记忆过程,但它为进一步的基于网络的干扰研究奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Network-based brain stimulation selectively impairs spatial retrieval.基于网络的脑刺激选择性地损害空间检索。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan-Feb;11(1):213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Hippocampal Theta Oscillations Support Successful Associative Memory Formation.海马体θ振荡支持成功的联想记忆形成。
J Neurosci. 2020 Dec 2;40(49):9507-9518. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0767-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

5
Brain stimulation and elicited memories.脑刺激与诱发记忆。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Oct;165(10):2737-2745. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05307-6. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
10
The Paradoxical Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation on Memory.深部脑刺激对记忆的矛盾效应。
Aging Dis. 2020 Feb 1;11(1):179-190. doi: 10.14336/AD.2019.0511. eCollection 2020 Feb.

本文引用的文献

6
Hippocampal-Prefrontal Theta Oscillations Support Memory Integration.海马体-前额叶θ振荡支持记忆整合。
Curr Biol. 2016 Feb 22;26(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.048. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
9
Mechanisms Responsible for Cognitive Impairment in Epilepsy.癫痫认知障碍的相关机制
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015 Sep 3;5(10):a022772. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022772.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验