Beales Ian
Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
F1000Res. 2017 Sep 27;6:1763. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11286.1. eCollection 2017.
Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage due to peptic ulcer bleeding remains an important cause of emergency presentation and hospital admission. Despite advances in many aspects of management, peptic ulcer bleeding is still associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Comprehensive international guidelines have been published, but advances as well as controversies continue to evolve. Important recent advances include the evidence supporting a more restrictive transfusion strategy aiming for a target haemoglobin of 70-90 g/l. Comparative studies have confirmed that the Glasgow-Blatchford score remains the most useful score for predicting the need for intervention as well as for identifying the lowest-risk patients suitable for outpatient management. New scores, including the AIMS65 and Progetto Nazionale Emorragia Digestiva score, may be more accurate in predicting mortality. Pre-endoscopy erythromycin appears to improve outcomes and is probably underused. High-dose oral proton pump inhibition (PPI) for 11 days after PPI infusion is advantageous in those with a Rockall score of 6 or more. Oral is as effective as parenteral iron at restoring haemoglobin levels after a peptic ulcer bleed and both are superior to placebo in this respect. Within endoscopic techniques, haemostatic powders and over-the-scope clips can be used when other methods have failed. A disposable Doppler probe appears to provide more accurate determination of both rebleeding risk and the success of endoscopic therapy than purely visual guidance. Non- , non-aspirin/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers contribute an increasing percentage of bleeding peptic ulcers and are associated with a poor prognosis and high rebleeding rate. The optimal management of these ulcers remains to be determined.
消化性溃疡出血所致的急性上消化道出血仍是急诊就诊和住院的重要原因。尽管在治疗的许多方面都取得了进展,但消化性溃疡出血仍与显著的发病率、死亡率及医疗费用相关。国际上已发布了综合指南,但进展与争议仍在不断演变。近期的重要进展包括有证据支持采用更严格的输血策略,目标血红蛋白水平为70 - 90 g/l。比较研究证实,格拉斯哥 - 布拉奇福德评分仍是预测干预需求以及识别适合门诊治疗的低风险患者最有用的评分。新的评分,包括AIMS65评分和意大利国家消化性出血研究项目评分,在预测死亡率方面可能更准确。内镜检查前使用红霉素似乎能改善预后,且可能未得到充分应用。对于罗卡尔评分6分及以上的患者,在静脉输注质子泵抑制剂(PPI)后口服高剂量PPI 11天是有益的。在消化性溃疡出血后恢复血红蛋白水平方面,口服铁剂与胃肠外铁剂同样有效,且在这方面两者均优于安慰剂。在内镜技术中,当其他方法无效时可使用止血粉和套扎器。与单纯视觉引导相比,一次性多普勒探头似乎能更准确地确定再出血风险和内镜治疗的成功率。非甾体类抗炎药相关性溃疡、非阿司匹林/非甾体类抗炎药溃疡导致的出血性消化性溃疡所占比例日益增加,且与预后不良和再出血率高相关。这些溃疡的最佳治疗方案仍有待确定。