Arthritis Clinic & Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Arthritis Institute, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;20(11):1658-1673. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13192. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) is a common, yet controversial therapeutic option in treating knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of the present study was to assess the risk of bias (RoB) of systematic reviews (SRs) and to summarize available evidence of HA in treating knee OA.
A systematic search of SRs published through to December 2016 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The RoB of included SRs was assessed by ROBIS tool. In addition, the methodological quality of primary studies in SRs with low RoB was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook. The evidence quality of each primary outcome of SRs with low RoB was determined by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system.
Thirty-one SRs were eligible for inclusion. According to the ROBIS tool, there were 13 SRs with low RoB, 16 with high RoB and two with unclear RoB. The methodological quality of a total of 135 primary studies was evaluated and summarized. Forty-two outcomes from these 13 SRs were classified into the four following quality levels based on the GRADE approach: three outcomes with high quality, eight with moderate quality, 12 with low quality and 19 with very low quality.
This study evaluated RoB in SRs for managing knee OA with HA and assessed the evidence quality of each primary outcome in SRs with low RoB. These results can help users of SRs to improve the process of SR assessment in developing overviews or guidelines, leading to more reliable recommendations for improvements in treating knee OA. Registration: PROSPERO ((http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO) [CRD42017057384].
关节内注射透明质酸(HA)是治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)的一种常见但存在争议的治疗选择。本研究的目的是评估系统评价(SRs)的偏倚风险(RoB),并总结 HA 治疗膝 OA 的现有证据。
通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆对截至 2016 年 12 月发表的 SRs 进行系统检索。使用 ROBIS 工具评估纳入 SRs 的 RoB。此外,对于 RoB 较低的 SRs 中的初级研究,根据 Cochrane 手册评估其方法学质量。对于 RoB 较低的 SRs 的每个主要结局的证据质量,通过 GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定与评价)系统确定。
31 篇 SRs 符合纳入标准。根据 ROBIS 工具,有 13 篇 SRs 的 RoB 较低,16 篇 RoB 较高,2 篇 RoB 不清楚。共评估并总结了这 13 篇 SRs 中的 135 项初级研究的方法学质量。根据 GRADE 方法,这 13 篇 SRs 的 42 个结局分为以下四个质量级别:3 个结局为高质量,8 个为中质量,12 个为低质量,19 个为极低质量。
本研究评估了 HA 治疗膝 OA 的 SRs 的 RoB,并评估了 RoB 较低的 SRs 中每个主要结局的证据质量。这些结果可以帮助 SRs 用户在制定综述或指南时提高 SR 评估过程,从而为改善膝 OA 的治疗提供更可靠的建议。注册:PROSPERO ((http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO) [CRD42017057384])。