Suppr超能文献

实施患者自控硬膜外镇痛后对追加给药次数的影响:一项队列研究。

Influence on number of top-ups after implementing patient controlled epidural analgesia: A cohort study.

作者信息

van Samkar Ganapathy, Hermanns Henning, Lirk Philipp, Hollmann Markus W, Stevens Markus F

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186225. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Postoperative epidural analgesia often needs rate readjustment using top-ups. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is said to reduce the requirement of epidural top-ups when compared to continuous epidural analgesia (CEA). We compared CEA and PCEA in major thoracic and abdominal surgery, in a cohort study. The primary endpoint was the required number of epidural top-ups. Secondary endpoints were pain scores, side effects and workload differences. We analysed 199 patients with CEA and 187 with PCEA. Both groups had similar pain scores. The total number of top-ups was 75 in 57 patients (CEA) versus 20 top-ups in 18 patients (PCEA). (p = 0.0001) Sedation tended to occur more frequently in patients with CEA versus PCEA, 5.5% vs 1.6% (p = 0.05). Implementation of PCEA led to a decreased number of top-ups, fewer side-effects and decreased use of the postoperative care unit.

摘要

术后硬膜外镇痛通常需要通过追加药物来调整速率。与持续硬膜外镇痛(CEA)相比,患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)据说可减少硬膜外追加药物的需求。在一项队列研究中,我们比较了CEA和PCEA在大型胸腹部手术中的效果。主要终点是硬膜外追加药物的所需次数。次要终点是疼痛评分、副作用和工作量差异。我们分析了199例接受CEA的患者和187例接受PCEA的患者。两组的疼痛评分相似。追加药物的总数在57例接受CEA的患者中为75次,而在18例接受PCEA的患者中为20次。(p = 0.0001)与PCEA相比,CEA患者中镇静的发生率往往更高,分别为5.5%和1.6%(p = 0.05)。实施PCEA可减少追加药物的次数、减少副作用并减少术后护理单元的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa7/5646815/63c613aee108/pone.0186225.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验