León Cielo M, Muñoz Marina, Hernández Carolina, Ayala Martha S, Flórez Carolina, Teherán Aníbal, Cubides Juan R, Ramírez Juan D
Universidad del Rosario, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Programa de Biología, Grupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas-UR (GIMUR), Bogotá, Colombia.
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 4;8:1907. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01907. eCollection 2017.
Leishmaniasis comprises a spectrum of parasitic diseases caused by protozoans of the genus . Molecular tools have been widely employed for the detection of due to its high sensitivity and specificity. However, the analytical performance of molecular platforms as PCR and real time PCR (qPCR) including a wide variety of molecular markers has never been evaluated. Herein, the aim was to evaluate the analytical performance of 4 PCR-based assays (designed on four different targets) and applied on conventional and real-time PCR platforms. We evaluated the analytical performance of conventional PCR and real time PCR, determining exclusivity and inclusivity, Anticipated Reportable Range (ARR), limit of detection (LoD) and accuracy using primers directed to kDNA, HSP70, 18S and ITS-1 targets. We observed that the kDNA was the most sensitive but does not meet the criterion of exclusivity. The HSP70 presented a higher LoD in conventional PCR and qPCR in comparison with the other markers (1 × 10 and 1 × 10 equivalent parasites/mL respectively) and had a higher coefficient of variation in qPCR. No statistically significant differences were found between the days of the test with the four molecular markers. The present study revealed that the 18S marker presented the best performance in terms of analytical sensitivity and specificity for the qPCR in the species tested (species circulating in Colombia). Therefore, we recommend to explore the analytical and diagnostic performance in future studies using a broader number of species across America.
利什曼病是由利什曼原虫属的原生动物引起的一系列寄生虫病。由于其高灵敏度和特异性,分子工具已被广泛用于利什曼原虫的检测。然而,包括多种分子标记在内的PCR和实时PCR(qPCR)等分子平台的分析性能从未得到评估。在此,目的是评估4种基于PCR的检测方法(针对四个不同靶点设计)在常规和实时PCR平台上的分析性能。我们使用针对kDNA、HSP70、18S和ITS-1靶点的引物,评估了常规PCR和实时PCR的分析性能,确定了排他性和包容性、预期报告范围(ARR)、检测限(LoD)和准确性。我们观察到kDNA最敏感,但不符合排他性标准。与其他标记相比,HSP70在常规PCR和qPCR中的检测限更高(分别为1×10和1×10个等效寄生虫/毫升),并且在qPCR中的变异系数更高。使用这四种分子标记进行检测的不同日期之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。本研究表明,在所测试的物种(哥伦比亚流行的物种)中,18S标记在qPCR的分析灵敏度和特异性方面表现最佳。因此,我们建议在未来的研究中使用更广泛的美洲物种来探索其分析和诊断性能。