相似文献
1
Can we trust the results of scientific papers?
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Oct;70(5):491-492. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.5.491. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):147-67. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9628-2. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
3
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):704-720. doi: 10.1177/0963662515617367. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
4
Research collaborations: trial, trust, and truth.
Cell. 2006 Sep 8;126(5):823-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.018.
5
Trust in scientific experts on obesity: implications for awareness and behavior change.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Aug;15(8):2145-56. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.255.
6
Scientometric analysis of anthropology in the Republic of Croatia for the period of 1980-1996.
Coll Antropol. 1997 Jun;21(1):301-18.
7
What type of information is trusted by whom? A multilevel analysis of the stability of the information source-trust association for blood transfusion.
Transfusion. 2009 Aug;49(8):1637-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02179.x.
8
Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities.
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Jan;27(1):11-28. doi: 10.1177/0963662516661090. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
Trust relations in health care: an agenda for future research.
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(5):477-84. doi: 10.1108/14777260610701830.
10
Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Oct;26(7):843-860. doi: 10.1177/0963662516636040. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of risk of bias in quasi-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials reported in the between 2010 and 2016.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Oct;70(5):511-519. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.5.511. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
2
Retraction Note to multiple articles in Tumor Biology.
Tumour Biol. 2017 Apr 20. doi: 10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.
3
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
4
Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 May 18.
5
Editorial retraction.
Science. 2006 Jan 20;311(5759):335. doi: 10.1126/science.1124926. Epub 2006 Jan 12.
6
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1992-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992.
7
Reported data on granisetron and postoperative nausea and vomiting by Fujii et al. Are incredibly nice!
Anesth Analg. 2000 Apr;90(4):1004-7.
Zotero 插件