Huynh Linda My, Huang Erica, Patel Roshan M, Okhunov Zhamshid
Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 2100, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Oct 18;18(12):95. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0740-5.
Preoperative nomograms offer systematic and quantitative methods to assess patient- and stone-related characteristics and their impact on successful treatment and potential risk of complication. Discrepancies in the correlation of perioperative variables to patient outcomes have led to the individual development, validation, and application of four independent scoring systems for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society nomogram, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity. The optimal nomogram should have high predictive ability, be practically integrated into clinical use, and be widely applicable to urinary stone disease. Herein, we seek to provide a contemporary evaluation of the advantages, disadvantages, and commonalities of each scoring system. While the current data is insufficient to conclude which scoring system is destined to become the gold standard, it is crucial that a nephrolithometric scoring system be incorporated into common practice to improve surgical planning, patient counseling, and outcome assessment.
术前列线图提供了系统且定量的方法来评估患者及结石相关特征,以及它们对成功治疗和潜在并发症风险的影响。围手术期变量与患者预后之间相关性的差异导致了经皮肾镜取石术的四个独立评分系统的个体化开发、验证和应用:盖伊结石评分、S.T.O.N.E. 肾结石测量法、泌尿外科协会临床研究办公室列线图和首尔国立大学肾结石复杂性评分。最佳列线图应具有高预测能力,能切实融入临床应用,并广泛适用于尿路结石疾病。在此,我们旨在对每个评分系统的优缺点及共性进行当代评估。虽然目前的数据不足以得出哪个评分系统注定会成为金标准,但将肾结石测量评分系统纳入常规实践对于改善手术规划、患者咨询和预后评估至关重要。