Suppr超能文献

单孔经皮腹膜外修补术与三孔迷你腹腔镜修补术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的比较

Comparison of Single-Port Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Repair and Three-Port Mini-Laparoscopic Repair for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia.

作者信息

Korkmaz Mevlit, Güvenç B Haluk

机构信息

1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emsey Hospital , İstanbul, Turkey .

2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University , Bakırköy, Turkey .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):337-342. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0223. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

AIM

Laparoscopy has been widely used in surgical practice in pediatric age, and many techniques for laparoscopic hernia repair have been described till now. In this study, we compared two laparoscopic techniques performed by two surgeons; each surgeon practicing only one of the two techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the surgical charts, enrolling 71 patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernia. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of surgery: (Group A, 24 patients aged 2 months-8 years) laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing technique and (Group B, 47 patients aged 35 days-12 years) three-port mini-laparoscopic technique. The hernia sac was ligated at the level of internal ring, using nonabsorbable 4/0-3/0 suture. Any unexpected contralateral opening was repaired in the same manner for both groups. Follow-up period was 4 months-2 years and 9 months-8 years, respectively. Operative time and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Operation time (19.58 ± 7.06 minutes versus 35.87 ± 10.34 minutes, P < .001) was shorter in the percutaneous repair group. However, when subdivided by unilateral and bilateral presentation, only unilateral operative time was shorter compared to three-port group. There were no recurrences in Group A, while two recurrences occurred in Group B during the learning curve period. A contralateral opening accompanied the presenting unilateral hernia in 3 cases for Group A and 16 for Group B. One patient had to be converted open resulting from epigastric vessel injury, and postop hydrocele formation was seen in another in Group A. No intraoperative complications were seen in Group B.

CONCLUSION

The overall experience shows that laparoscopic repair is a reliable approach regardless of the chosen technique. Percutaneous repair seems to be a less invasive method with shorter operative time, but it is not free of complications according to this series.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜检查已在儿科手术中广泛应用,目前已有多种腹腔镜疝修补技术被描述。在本研究中,我们比较了两位外科医生实施的两种腹腔镜技术;每位医生仅施行两种技术中的一种。

材料与方法

对手术记录进行回顾性分析,纳入71例单纯性腹股沟疝患者。根据手术类型将患者分为两组:(A组,24例,年龄2个月至8岁)腹腔镜经皮内环缝合技术和(B组,47例,年龄35天至12岁)三孔迷你腹腔镜技术。使用不可吸收的4/0 - 3/0缝线在内环水平结扎疝囊。两组对任何意外的对侧开口均以相同方式进行修复。随访期分别为4个月至2年9个月以及9个月至8年。分析手术时间和并发症。

结果

经皮修复组的手术时间(19.58 ± 7.06分钟对35.87 ± 10.34分钟,P <.001)较短。然而,按单侧和双侧表现细分时,仅单侧手术时间比三孔组短。A组无复发,而B组在学习曲线期有2例复发。A组有3例、B组有16例呈现单侧疝的同时伴有对侧开口。1例患者因上腹血管损伤转为开放手术;A组另1例术后出现鞘膜积液。B组未见术中并发症。

结论

总体经验表明,无论选择何种技术腹腔镜修补都是一种可靠方法。经皮修复似乎是一种侵入性较小且手术时间较短的方法,但根据本系列研究其并非没有并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验