Suppr超能文献

接受心脏手术的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的术后结局:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

Postoperative Outcomes in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

作者信息

Nagappa Mahesh, Ho George, Patra Jayadeep, Wong Jean, Singh Mandeep, Kaw Roop, Cheng Davy, Chung Frances

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St Joseph Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):2030-2037. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002558.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and may predispose patients to postoperative complications. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine the evidence of postoperative complications associated with OSA patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A literature search of Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Medline In-process, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL until October 2016 was performed. The search was constrained to studies in adult cardiac surgical patients with diagnosed or suspected OSA. All included studies must report at least 1 postoperative complication. The primary outcome is major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) up to 30 days after surgery, which includes death from all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, myocardial injury, nonfatal cardiac arrest, revascularization process, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, newly documented postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), stroke, and congestive heart failure. Secondary outcome is newly documented POAF. The other exploratory outcomes include the following: (1) postoperative tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation; (2) infection and/or sepsis; (3) unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission; and (4) duration of stay in hospital and ICU. Meta-analysis and meta- regression were conducted using Cochrane Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane, London, UK) and OpenBUGS v3.0, respectively.

RESULTS

Eleven comparative studies were included (n = 1801 patients; OSA versus non-OSA: 688 vs 1113, respectively). MACCEs were 33.3% higher odds in OSA versus non-OSA patients (OSA versus non-OSA: 31% vs 10.6%; odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.2; P = .002). The odds of newly documented POAF (OSA versus non-OSA: 31% vs 21%; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.13-3.33; P = .02) was higher in OSA compared to non-OSA. Even though the postoperative tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (OSA versus non-OSA: 13% vs 5.4%; OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.03-6.89; P = .04) were significantly higher in OSA patients, the length of ICU stay and hospital stay were not significantly prolonged in patients with OSA compared to non-OSA. The majority of OSA patients were not treated with continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis of the subgroups did not impact the OR of postoperative complications for OSA versus non-OSA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that after cardiac surgery, MACCEs and newly documented POAF were 33.3% and 18.1% higher odds in OSA versus non-OSA patients, respectively.

摘要

背景

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是心脏手术患者中常见的合并症,可能使患者易发生术后并发症。本荟萃分析的目的是确定心脏手术OSA患者术后并发症的相关证据。

方法

检索Cochrane系统评价数据库、Medline、Medline在研数据库、科学引文索引、Scopus、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和护理学与健康领域数据库,检索时间截至2016年10月。检索限于诊断或疑似OSA的成年心脏手术患者的研究。所有纳入研究必须报告至少1种术后并发症。主要结局是术后30天内的主要不良心脏或脑血管事件(MACCE),包括各种原因导致的死亡、心肌梗死、心肌损伤、非致死性心脏骤停、血运重建、肺栓塞、深静脉血栓形成、新记录的术后房颤(POAF)、中风和充血性心力衰竭。次要结局是新记录的POAF。其他探索性结局包括:(1)术后气管插管和机械通气;(2)感染和/或脓毒症;(3)非计划入住重症监护病房(ICU);(4)住院和ICU住院时间。分别使用Cochrane系统评价管理软件5.3(Cochrane,英国伦敦)和OpenBUGS v3.0进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归。

结果

纳入11项对照研究(n = 1801例患者;OSA组与非OSA组分别为688例和1113例)。与非OSA患者相比,OSA患者发生MACCE的几率高33.3%(OSA组与非OSA组分别为31%和10.6%;比值比[OR]为2.4;95%置信区间[CI]为1.38 - 4.2;P = 0.002)。与非OSA患者相比,OSA患者新记录的POAF几率更高(OSA组与非OSA组分别为31%和21%;OR为1.94;95%CI为1.13 - 3.33;P = 0.02)。尽管OSA患者术后气管插管和机械通气的发生率显著更高(OSA组与非OSA组分别为13%和5.4%;OR为2.67;95%CI为1.03 - 6.89;P = 0.04),但与非OSA患者相比,OSA患者的ICU住院时间和住院时间并未显著延长。大多数OSA患者未接受持续气道正压通气治疗。亚组的荟萃回归和敏感性分析未影响OSA组与非OSA组术后并发症的OR值。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,心脏手术后,与非OSA患者相比,OSA患者发生MACCE和新记录的POAF的几率分别高33.3%和18.1%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验