Suppr超能文献

剪切波弹性成像在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的价值:一项荟萃分析。

Value of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Xue Yan, Yao Shuxin, Li Xiaodong, Zhang Huarong

机构信息

Department of Ultrasonography, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi City, Shandong Department of Ultrasonography, Heze Municipal Hospital, Heze City, Shandong Department of Radiology, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi City, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(42):e7412. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007412.

Abstract

The analysis was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for malignant breast lesions through a meta-analysis.Related articles were searched from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library. Overall sensitivity and specificity were analyzed with DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Area under curve with corresponding 95% confidence interval (were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SWE. Sensitivity and publication bias were assessed as well.A total of 25 articles including 4128 patients and 4546 breast lesions were included in the pooled analysis. In the subgroup analysis, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SWE in Asian population were 0.84 (0.79-0.88) and 0.87 (0.84-0.90), respectively, whereas they were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.89 (0.84-0.92) in Caucasian population. The diagnostic accuracy of SWE was a little higher for Caucasians than for Asians (0.95 vs. 0.92). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of virtual touch tissue quantification were 0.85 (0.77-0.91) and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), respectively. It showed a little higher value in specificity and summary ROC curve than SWE (0.93 vs. 0.87; 0.95 vs. 0.93). In addition, maximum stiffness exhibited higher detection sensitivity than that of mean stiffness (0.91 vs. 0.85).SWE serves as an accurate diagnostic technology for discriminating between malignant and benign breast lesions.

摘要

本分析旨在通过荟萃分析评估剪切波弹性成像(SWE)对乳腺恶性病变的诊断准确性。从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索相关文章。采用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型分析总体敏感性和特异性。计算曲线下面积及相应的95%置信区间,以评估SWE的诊断准确性。同时评估敏感性和发表偏倚。共有25篇文章纳入汇总分析,涉及4128例患者和4546个乳腺病变。在亚组分析中,SWE在亚洲人群中的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为0.84(0.79 - 0.88)和0.87(0.84 - 0.90),而在白种人群中分别为0.92(0.86 - 0.96)和0.89(0.84 - 0.92)。SWE对白种人的诊断准确性略高于亚洲人(0.95对0.92)。虚拟触诊组织定量的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为0.85(0.77 - 0.91)和0.93(0.88 - 0.96)。其特异性和汇总ROC曲线值略高于SWE(0.93对0.87;0.95对0.93)。此外,最大硬度的检测敏感性高于平均硬度(0.91对0.85)。SWE是鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的一种准确诊断技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52d/5662340/4ecc1df98534/medi-96-e7412-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验