Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术中病态肥胖产妇的风险评估:一项前瞻性队列单中心研究。

Risk assessment of morbidly obese parturient in cesarean section delivery: A prospective, cohort, single-center study.

作者信息

An Xiaohu, Zhao Yanhong, Zhang Ying, Yang Qiling, Wang Yilong, Cheng Weiwei, Yang Zeyong

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(42):e8265. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008265.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 40% of women gain excessive weight during pregnancy. Obesity complications and risks in parturient women undergoing cesarean section (CS) with different anesthetic methods remain unknown. This study aimed to assess the safety and risk of obese women undergoing CS delivery with various perioperative anesthetic methods.

METHODS

Seven hundred ninety parturient women underwent CS under general anesthesia (GA), intraspinal anesthesia including epidural anesthesia (EA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). They were divided into morbid (n = 255), severe (n = 274), and non-obesity (n = 261) groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03002636).

RESULT

Between 2013 and 2016, 790 pregnant were assessed. Compared with the non-obesity group, there were significantly more fetal distress and higher body mass index (BMI) in the morbid obesity group (P = .0001 and P = .001, respectively). Significantly more patients showed preeclampsia, multifetation, amniotic fluid abnormality, and high bleeding amounts in the morbid obesity group compared with the non-obesity group (P = .0001, P = .048, P = .017, and P = .018, respectively); more patients were administered EA and GA compared with the non-obesity group (P = .0001 and P = .0001, respectively). More post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) patients were found in the severe obesity group no more than the non-obesity group. Significantly increased anesthesia puncture times for 5 > n ≥ 3 and n ≥ 5 were obtained in the morbid obesity group (P = .0001 and P = .0001, respectively), with more patients in the puncture sitting position, compared with the non-obesity group (P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

GA, EA, and CSEA are safe and effective in severely or morbidly obese patients. Morbidly obese parturient show increased likelihood for fetal distress, PACU, sitting position puncture, puncture difficulty, and other pregnancy complications. There were more anesthesia puncture times in morbidly obese patients.

摘要

背景

高达40%的女性在孕期体重过度增加。采用不同麻醉方法的剖宫产产妇的肥胖并发症及风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估采用各种围手术期麻醉方法进行剖宫产分娩的肥胖女性的安全性和风险。

方法

790名产妇在全身麻醉(GA)、包括硬膜外麻醉(EA)和腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉(CSEA)在内的脊髓麻醉下接受剖宫产。她们被分为病态肥胖组(n = 255)、重度肥胖组(n = 274)和非肥胖组(n = 261)。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(编号NCT03002636)。

结果

2013年至2016年期间,对790名孕妇进行了评估。与非肥胖组相比,病态肥胖组胎儿窘迫显著更多,体重指数(BMI)更高(分别为P = 0.0001和P = 0.001)。与非肥胖组相比,病态肥胖组出现先兆子痫、多胎妊娠、羊水异常和出血量多的患者显著更多(分别为P = 0.0001、P = 0.048、P = 0.017和P = 0.018);与非肥胖组相比,接受EA和GA的患者更多(分别为P = 0.0001和P = 0.0001)。重度肥胖组麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的患者数量不超过非肥胖组。病态肥胖组5>n≥3和n≥5时麻醉穿刺次数显著增加(分别为P = 0.0001和P = 0.0001),与非肥胖组相比,穿刺时采取坐位的患者更多(P = 0.0001)。

结论

GA、EA和CSEA在重度或病态肥胖患者中安全有效。病态肥胖产妇出现胎儿窘迫、PACU、坐位穿刺、穿刺困难及其他妊娠并发症的可能性增加。病态肥胖患者的麻醉穿刺次数更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58d0/5662385/d5e7ca4edc2d/medi-96-e8265-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验