Zazzeroni Luca, Pasquinelli Gianandea, Nanni Eleonora, Cremonini Valeria, Rubbi Ivan
Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
School of Nursing, ASL Romagna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2017;42(4):717-727. doi: 10.1159/000484115. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The increase in the survival rate of patients with chronic renal failure due to substitution treatment prompts an investigation of their quality of life (QoL), a key measure to evaluate the outcomes of chronic disease treatment. To determine whether hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis provide a better QoL, a systematic meta-analysis was performed.
We searched through the database Cinahl, Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Proquest, including articles published from 2011 until June 2016. We selected articles that compared, through KDQOL-SF 1.3 or 36 questionnaires, QoL among patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. The data was collected using Excel Office, and t-test has been performed on independent samples to identify significant differences.
Only some of the seven articles found significant differences between the two treatments. One of the studies showed a better QoL for peritoneal dialysis patients, while, on the contrary, two other studies support that the best QoL is in patients receiving hemodialysis. Another article displayed significant difference only for satisfaction in relation to care, better in patients on peritoneal dialysis, and for physical health, better in hemodialysis.
The analysis has not led to a unanimous conclusion. Quantitative analysis showed that the only statistically significant difference between the QoL of patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis regards the effect of kidney disease, which happens to be better in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.
背景/目的:由于替代治疗使慢性肾衰竭患者的存活率提高,促使人们对其生活质量(QoL)进行研究,这是评估慢性病治疗效果的一项关键指标。为了确定血液透析或腹膜透析哪种能提供更好的生活质量,我们进行了一项系统的荟萃分析。
我们在CINAHL、Medline、PubMed、Scopus和ProQuest数据库中进行检索,纳入2011年至2016年6月发表的文章。我们选择了那些通过KDQOL-SF 1.3或36问卷比较血液透析和腹膜透析患者生活质量的文章。数据使用Excel Office收集,并对独立样本进行t检验以确定显著差异。
七篇文章中只有部分发现两种治疗方法之间存在显著差异。其中一项研究表明腹膜透析患者的生活质量更好,而相反,另外两项研究支持接受血液透析的患者生活质量最佳。另一篇文章仅显示在护理满意度方面存在显著差异,腹膜透析患者的满意度更高,而在身体健康方面,血液透析患者更好。
该分析未得出一致结论。定量分析表明,血液透析和腹膜透析患者生活质量之间唯一具有统计学意义的差异在于肾病的影响,腹膜透析患者的情况更好。