Suppr超能文献

氮卓斯汀治疗外源性哮喘患者的临床疗效及其对气道反应性的影响研究。

A study of the clinical efficacy of azelastine in patients with extrinsic asthma, and its effect on airway responsiveness.

作者信息

Gould C A, Ollier S, Aurich R, Davies R J

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Nov;26(5):515-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb05291.x.

Abstract
  1. The effect of 4.4 mg azelastine administered orally on airway responsiveness, skin prick testing, daily peak expiratory flow rates and symptoms of asthma was compared with placebo in a 7 week double-blind, parallel group study of 24 patients with extrinsic asthma. The study was in two parts: a 2 week assessment period, during which all patients received placebo tablets but recorded daily peak flow rates (PEFRs) and symptoms, preceding the 7 week double-blind comparison. 2. Azelastine, 4.4 mg, significantly decreased airway responsiveness to histamine compared with placebo both after a single dose (P less than 0.001), and following 7 weeks continuous treatment (P less than 0.02). Airway responsiveness to methacholine was not altered by administration of azelastine compared with placebo. 3. Skin prick test weal diameters to both allergen and histamine were significantly reduced after both a single dose and following 7 weeks continuous therapy treatment with azelastine. 4. There was a significant improvement in both the mean of the morning and the evening peak flow rates recorded during the last week compared with the first week of the study in the group receiving 4.4 mg of azelastine twice daily compared with placebo. Scores for wheeze were significantly reduced during the final 3 weeks of the study in patients receiving azelastine compared both with those receiving placebo and with the first week of the study (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.01). Consumption of inhaled bronchodilators fell significantly during the study in the group receiving azelastine therapy (P less than 0.05); no such fall occurred in the placebo treated patients. 5. A bitter metallic taste was reported by 58% of patients who received azelastine therapy.
摘要
  1. 在一项为期7周的双盲平行组研究中,对24例过敏性哮喘患者口服4.4毫克氮卓斯汀对气道反应性、皮肤点刺试验、每日呼气峰值流速和哮喘症状的影响与安慰剂进行了比较。该研究分为两个部分:一个为期2周的评估期,在此期间所有患者均服用安慰剂片,但在7周双盲比较之前记录每日峰值流速(PEFR)和症状。2. 与安慰剂相比,4.4毫克氮卓斯汀单剂量给药后(P<0.001)以及连续治疗7周后(P<0.02),均能显著降低气道对组胺的反应性。与安慰剂相比,氮卓斯汀给药后气道对乙酰甲胆碱的反应性未改变。3. 单剂量以及连续治疗7周后,氮卓斯汀对变应原和组胺的皮肤点刺试验风团直径均显著减小。4. 与安慰剂相比,在接受每日两次4.4毫克氮卓斯汀治疗的组中,与研究第一周相比,最后一周记录的早晚峰值流速平均值均有显著改善。与接受安慰剂的患者以及研究第一周相比,接受氮卓斯汀治疗的患者在研究最后3周的喘息评分显著降低(P<0.05,P<0.01)。在接受氮卓斯汀治疗的组中,研究期间吸入性支气管扩张剂的消耗量显著下降(P<0.05);接受安慰剂治疗的患者未出现这种下降。5. 接受氮卓斯汀治疗的患者中有58%报告有苦味金属味。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Bronchial hyperreactivity.支气管高反应性
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Feb;121(2):389-413. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.2.389.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验