正畸中骨骼锚固系统的成功率：回顾性分析。
Success rates of a skeletal anchorage system in orthodontics: A retrospective analysis.
出版信息
Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):27-34. doi: 10.2319/060617-375.1. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the premise that skeletal anchorage with SAS miniplates are highly successful and predictable for a range of complex orthodontic movements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective cross-sectional analysis consisted of 421 bone plates placed by one clinician in 163 patients (95 female, 68 male, mean age 29.4 years ± 12.02). Simple descriptive statistics were performed for a wide range of malocclusions and desired movements to obtain success, complication, and failure rates.
RESULTS
The success rate of skeletal anchorage system miniplates was 98.6%, where approximately 40% of cases experienced mild complications. The most common complication was soft tissue inflammation, which was amenable to focused oral hygiene and antiseptic rinses. Infection occurred in approximately 15% of patients where there was a statistically significant correlation with poor oral hygiene. The most common movements were distalization and intrusion of teeth. More than a third of the cases involved complex movements in more than one plane of space.
CONCLUSIONS
The success rate of skeletal anchorage system miniplates is high and predictable for a wide range of complex orthodontic movements.
摘要
目的
评估 SAS 迷你板骨锚固在一系列复杂的正畸治疗中的高成功率和可预测性。
材料和方法
这是一项回顾性的病例交叉分析，共纳入 163 名患者（95 名女性，68 名男性，平均年龄 29.4 岁±12.02 岁）的 421 块骨板。对各种错颌畸形和所需的移动进行了简单的描述性统计，以获得成功率、并发症和失败率。
结果
骨锚固系统迷你板的成功率为 98.6%，约 40%的病例出现轻度并发症。最常见的并发症是软组织炎症，可通过口腔卫生和抗菌漱口水来处理。感染约发生在 15%的患者中，与口腔卫生不良有统计学显著相关性。最常见的移动是牙齿的远移和内收。超过三分之一的病例涉及一个以上空间平面的复杂运动。
结论
骨锚固系统迷你板在治疗一系列复杂的正畸治疗中具有较高的成功率和可预测性。
相似文献
1
Success rates of a skeletal anchorage system in orthodontics: A retrospective analysis.正畸中骨骼锚固系统的成功率：回顾性分析。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):27-34. doi: 10.2319/060617-375.1. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
2
Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.上颌前突牙列治疗效果的三维牙科模型分析：头帽、微螺钉和微型钛板骨锚固的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):636-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017.
3
Sagittal skeletal correction using symphyseal miniplate anchorage systems : Success rates and complications.使用耻骨联合微型钢板锚固系统进行矢状面骨骼矫正：成功率和并发症
J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Jan;80(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0160-2. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
4
Clinical study of temporary anchorage devices for orthodontic treatment--stability of micro/mini-screws and mini-plates: experience with 455 cases.正畸治疗中临时支抗装置的临床研究——微/迷你螺钉及迷你钛板的稳定性：455例经验
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2010;51(3):151-63. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.51.151.
5
Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics--a review of various systems in animal and human studies.正畸学中的骨锚固——动物和人体研究中各种系统的综述
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):75-88.
6
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.成人上颌牙牙槽骨前突患者使用骨锚固与口外锚固治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
7
Stability of a locking plate and self-drilling screws as orthodontic skeletal anchorage in the maxilla: a retrospective study.锁定钢板和自攻螺钉作为上颌骨正畸骨骼锚固的稳定性：一项回顾性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Aug;68(8):1783-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 May 13.
8
Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction.微型钢板骨锚式上颌骨牵引的成功率。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1010-3. doi: 10.2319/012311-47.1. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
9
Surgical difficulties, success, and complication rates of orthodontic miniplate anchorage systems: Experience with 382 miniplates.正畸微型钛板锚固系统的手术难度、成功率及并发症发生率：382块微型钛板的经验
Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 May;20(5):512-516. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.187320.
10
Survival analysis of a miniplate and tube device designed to provide skeletal anchorage.设计用于提供骨骼锚固的微型板和管装置的生存分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Sep;144(3):349-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.026.
引用本文的文献
1
Study on the Reasonability of Single-Objective Optimization in Miniscrew Design.微螺钉设计中单目标优化的合理性研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;18(5):973. doi: 10.3390/ma18050973.
2
Experience of the surgeon affects the success rate of the placement of orthodontic miniplates.外科医生的经验会影响正畸微型钢板植入的成功率。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Mar 11;84:112-118. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.43123.
3
Craniomandibular transverse tomographic evaluation after anterior open bite orthodontic treatment with miniplates anchorage.采用微型钢板锚固矫正前牙开咬畸形的颅颌横向断层评估。
Prog Orthod. 2024 May 27;25(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40510-024-00519-1.
4
Tooth movement with dental anchorage vs. skeletal anchorage: A systematic review of clinical trials.牙齿移动的牙支抗与骨支抗：一项临床试验的系统评价
J Orthod Sci. 2024 May 8;13:25. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_4_23. eCollection 2024.
5
Survival analysis of temporary anchorage devices: A retrospective analysis in a Nigerian orthodontic patient population.临时锚固装置的生存分析：尼日利亚正畸患者群体的回顾性分析。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Sep 4;12:45. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_10_23. eCollection 2023.
6
Effects of delayed appointments in fixed orthodontic patients due to lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病疫情封锁期间固定正畸患者预约延迟的影响
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023 Sep-Oct;13(5):652-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
Stress distribution and displacement in the maxillofacial complex during intrusion and distalization of the maxillary arch using miniplates versus mini-implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.微夹板与微种植体支抗远移上颌骨后，上颌复合体的应力分布与位移：三维有限元研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Mar 1;24(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00455-6.
8
Analysis for Predictors of Failure of Orthodontic Mini-implant Using Patient-Specific Finite Element Models.基于患者特定有限元模型的正畸微种植体失败预测因素分析。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Mar;51(3):594-603. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03067-z. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
9
Intrusion of posterior teeth using miniplates: intrusive mechanics is not the same as intrusion force.使用微型钢板后牙内倾：内倾机制与内倾力不同。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Oct 25;26(5):e21ins5. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e21ins5. eCollection 2021.
10
A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.一项关于正畸中临时锚固装置的特征及成功率-失败率的范围综述。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 6;10(5):78. doi: 10.3390/dj10050078.
本文引用的文献
1
Surgical difficulties, success, and complication rates of orthodontic miniplate anchorage systems: Experience with 382 miniplates.正畸微型钛板锚固系统的手术难度、成功率及并发症发生率：382块微型钛板的经验
Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 May;20(5):512-516. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.187320.
2
Skeletal anchorage for everybody? a questionnaire study on frequency of use and clinical indications in daily practice.适合所有人的骨锚固？一项关于日常实践中使用频率和临床适应症的问卷调查研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Mar;76(2):113-24, 126-8. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0275-z.
3
Advances in orthodontic anchorage with the use of mini-implant techniques.正畸支抗中微型种植体技术的进展。
Br Dent J. 2015 Feb 16;218(3):E4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.53.
4
Bone condition of the maxillary zygomatic process prior to orthodontic anchorage plate fixation.正畸锚固板固定术前上颌颧突的骨质情况。
J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Jan;76(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0261-5. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
5
Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.正畸矫治器治疗期间通过种植体或其他外科方法加强支抗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 19;2014(8):CD005098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005098.pub3.
6
Temporary skeletal anchorage devices: the case for miniplates.临时骨骼锚固装置：微型钢板的应用实例
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):559-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.010.
7
Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography.种植体植入角度对正畸微种植体成功率的影响及其他因素的锥形束 CT 研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Feb;143(2):173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.011.
8
Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis.正畸微螺钉种植体的失败率及相关危险因素：荟萃分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Nov;142(5):577-595.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.016.
9
Anatomical guidelines for miniscrew insertion: Vestibular interradicular sites.微螺钉植入的解剖学指南：前庭根间部位
J Clin Orthod. 2011 Mar;45(3):165-73.
10
Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.骨锚定上颌骨前牵引的牙颌面效应：连续治疗的 III 类错患者的对照研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.037.
Zotero 插件