• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微型钢板骨锚式上颌骨牵引的成功率。

Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction.

机构信息

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1010-3. doi: 10.2319/012311-47.1. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

DOI:10.2319/012311-47.1
PMID:21721948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8903855/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success rate of Bollard miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients (mean age, 12.0 ± 1.2 years; range, 8.7-14.8 years) with maxillary hypoplasia without congenital or acquired deformation were included in this study. A total of 100 Bollard modified miniplates were placed by the same surgeon. Ninety-nine miniplates were inserted under general anesthesia, and one was placed under local anesthesia because of initially soft bone conditions. Loading of the miniplates with 150 g elastics was initiated at 17.5 ± 6.9 days (range, 11-38 days) after surgery. Mean follow-up was provided at 20.8 ± 11.1 months (range, 6.5-46.2 months).

RESULTS

The overall success rate of miniplate anchorage in terms of stability was 97%. During orthodontic loading, five miniplates showed signs of mobility. After interruption of loading over 2 months, two miniplates became stable again. However, a total of three miniplates needed to be removed and were successfully replaced under local anesthesia after a mean healing period of 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Skeletal anchorage by means of Bollard modified miniplates is effective for BAMP. Success depends on proper presurgical patient counseling, minimal invasive surgery, good postsurgical instructions, and orthodontic follow-up.

摘要

目的

评估 Bollard 微型板锚固用于上颌骨牵引(BAMP)的成功率。

材料和方法

本研究纳入 25 例连续上颌骨发育不全且无先天性或后天性畸形的患者(平均年龄 12.0 ± 1.2 岁;范围 8.7-14.8 岁)。由同一位外科医生共放置 100 个 Bollard 改良微型板。99 个微型板在全身麻醉下插入,1 个因初始骨软条件在局部麻醉下插入。术后 17.5 ± 6.9 天(范围 11-38 天)开始用 150 g 橡皮筋加载微型板。平均随访 20.8 ± 11.1 个月(范围 6.5-46.2 个月)。

结果

微型板锚固的整体稳定性成功率为 97%。在正畸加载过程中,有 5 个微型板出现移动迹象。中断加载超过 2 个月后,有 2 个微型板再次稳定。然而,共有 3 个微型板需要取出,并在平均 3 个月的愈合期后成功在局部麻醉下更换。

结论

Bollard 改良微型板的骨锚固对 BAMP 有效。成功率取决于术前患者咨询、微创外科手术、良好的术后指导和正畸随访。

相似文献

1
Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction.微型钢板骨锚式上颌骨牵引的成功率。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1010-3. doi: 10.2319/012311-47.1. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
Surgical difficulties, success, and complication rates of orthodontic miniplate anchorage systems: Experience with 382 miniplates.正畸微型钛板锚固系统的手术难度、成功率及并发症发生率:382块微型钛板的经验
Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 May;20(5):512-516. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.187320.
3
Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.骨性支抗治疗对上颌后缩畸形的牙颌面效应。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.09.009.
4
Sagittal skeletal correction using symphyseal miniplate anchorage systems : Success rates and complications.使用耻骨联合微型钢板锚固系统进行矢状面骨骼矫正:成功率和并发症
J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Jan;80(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0160-2. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion.使用插入下颌骨联合处的微型钢板评估骨骼锚固式Forsus FRD的效果:治疗安氏II类错牙合的一种新方法。
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):413-9. doi: 10.2319/051314-345.1. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
6
Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.上颌骨骨锚定牵引相关上颌骨变化的三维评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):790-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.025.
7
Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.上颌骨牵引与微型板提供骨骼锚固在一个生长中的 III 类患者。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):99-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.025.
8
Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study.微型板锚定的面具治疗对面下部形态的影响:一项初步研究。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jul;81(4):639-46. doi: 10.2319/081010-473.1. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
9
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction to correct a class III skeletal relationship: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 218 patients.骨锚定上颌前牵引矫正 III 类骨骼关系:218 例患者的多中心回顾性分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Oct;46(10):1800-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
10
Miniplates and screws in treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with missing posterior teeth. A case report.微型钛板及螺丝钉用于治疗伴有后牙缺失的骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形:一例报告
Aust Orthod J. 2006 Nov;22(2):167-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Soft tissue changes associated with Class III orthopaedic treatment in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生长发育期患者Ⅲ类错颌正畸治疗相关的软组织变化:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Prog Orthod. 2025 Mar 17;26(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40510-025-00558-2.
2
Experience of the surgeon affects the success rate of the placement of orthodontic miniplates.外科医生的经验会影响正畸微型钢板植入的成功率。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Mar 11;84:112-118. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.43123.
3
Dentofacial and skeletal effects of two orthodontic maxillary protraction protocols: bone anchors versus facemask.两种上颌骨牵引矫正方案的牙颌面和骨骼影响:骨锚与面具。
Head Face Med. 2024 Oct 18;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00462-w.
4
Evaluation of bone thickness at infra-zygomatic crest region compared with cervical vertebrae maturation index.颧下嵴区域骨厚度与颈椎成熟指数的比较评估。
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):630-633. doi: 10.6026/973206300200630. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of different maxillary advancement protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a finite element analysis.不同上颌骨前徙方案在单侧唇腭裂患者中的比较:有限元分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 20;28(5):260. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05633-2.
6
A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.两种方法矫治替牙期骨性 III 类错颌畸形的回顾性比较:混合式螺旋扩弓器联合下颌骨迷你板和快速扩弓联合面具。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jan 23;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00446-z.
7
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.骨锚式上颌骨前牵引术(BAMP):综述
J Orthod Sci. 2022 May 4;11:8. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_153_21. eCollection 2022.
8
Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition.舌刺矫治器联合治疗混合牙列期严重骨性安氏III类错牙合的疗效观察
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;13(6):668-676. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1855.
9
Zygomatic-maxillary cortical bone thickness in hyper, normo and hypodivergent patients.颧骨上颌皮质骨厚度在高、正常和低角患者中的差异。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Mar 10;26(1):e211965. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.1.e211965.oar. eCollection 2021.
10
Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report.使用下颌和上颌骨锚固及颌间弹力牵引治疗安氏III类错牙合畸形:一例报告
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Nov 11;24(5):52-59. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.052-059.oar. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.骨锚定上颌骨前牵引的牙颌面效应:连续治疗的 III 类错患者的对照研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.037.
2
Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.两种上颌骨牵引方案的比较:骨锚与快速扩弓面弓。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):799-806. doi: 10.2319/111709-651.1.
3
Success of zygomatic plate-screw anchorage system.颧骨板螺钉锚固系统的成功。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;68(3):602-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.132.
4
Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.上颌骨牵引与口外弓的三维分析至微型板。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):274-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.009.
5
Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials.正畸治疗中的微种植钉:已发表临床试验的回顾与分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.027.
6
Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review.正畸临时锚定装置的存活率和失败率:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Dec;20(12):1351-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
7
Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.使用微型钢板对上颌骨进行正畸牵引:治疗面中部凹陷的新视角。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.007.
8
Survival analyses of surgical miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage.作为正畸支抗的微型外科螺钉的生存分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.018.
9
Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review.正畸微型种植体成功的关键因素:一项系统评价
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.017.
10
Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices.用于正畸支抗的微型钢板和微型螺钉的稳定性:492个临时支抗装置的经验
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01571.x.