Treatment of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation with orally inhaled AP301: A prospective, randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation (LTx) carries significant morbidity and mortality in the early post-operative period and is associated with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. AP301, an activator of epithelial sodium channel-mediated Na uptake represents a new concept for prevention and treatment of pulmonary edema and has shown promising results in the pre-clinical setting. This pilot study investigated the clinical effect of inhaled AP301 on patients with development of PGD > 1 according to International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria after primary LTx in a high-volume center and was conducted as a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center pilot-study including 20 patients. All consecutive patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were screened for PGD at arrival on the intensive care unit (ICU) after LTx. After randomization, inhaled AP301 or placebo was administered by nebulizer twice daily for 7 days or until extubation. Otherwise, patients were treated according to routine clinical protocol. Partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao)/fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio) values were obtained until extubation and assessed as a primary outcome parameter. Patients were monitored for 30 days within the study protocol.

RESULTS

From July 2013 to August 2014, 20 patients were randomized 1:1 to AP301 (Group 1) or placebo (Group 2). Both groups were comparable with regard to sex (40% women/60% men vs 50% women/50% men), mean age (55 ± 13 vs 54 ± 6 years), comorbidities, and diagnosis leading to LTx. The Pao/Fio ratio at the time of inclusion was comparable in both groups, with a mean 235.65 ± 90.78 vs 214.2 ± 95.84 (p = 0.405), and there was no significant difference in the extravascular lung water index (13.88 ± 5.28 vs 16 ± 6.29 ml/kg, p = 0.476). The primary end point was mean Pao/Fio ratio values between baseline and Day 3. In the AP301 group, only 1 patient was ventilated at Day 4 and no patients were ventilated after Day 4. In the placebo group, 5 patients were ventilated on Day 4 and 2 patients on Days 5, 6, and 7. The mean increase in the Pao/Fio ratio was significantly higher in Group 1 patients, and the mean between baseline and at 72 hours was 365.6 ± 90.4 in Group 1 vs 335.2 ± 42.3 in Group 2 (p = 0.049). The duration of intubation was shorter in Group 1 than in Group 2 patients (2 ± 0.82 vs 3.7 ± 1.95 days; p = 0.02). ICU stay was 7.5 ± 3.13 days in Group 1 vs 10.8 ± 8.65 days in group 2 (p = 0.57). Survival at 30 days was 100%. No severe adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was designed as a proof-of-concept pilot study. Although it was not powered to achieve statistical significances, the study demonstrated relevant clinical effects of inhaled AP301 on patients with PGD after primary LTx. The improved gas exchange led to a significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and a trend towards a shorter ICU stay. Further investigation of AP301 for treatment of PGD in larger studies is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2013-000716-21/AT.