Efficacy and tolerability of mexiletine treatment in patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

BACKGROUND

Antiarrhythmic treatment of patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia, in whom catheter ablation and amiodarone treatment were ineffective or contraindicated, is an unsolved clinical problem.

AIM

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mexiletine in patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and/or electrical storm events, in whom standard treatment strategies failed to prevent ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients treated with mexiletine for recurrent ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation in our institution between January 2011 and September 2015. The primary endpoints were total number of electrical storm events and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes after the beginning of mexiletine therapy. Secondary endpoints were total number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies and discontinuation of the therapy. Events were compared with a matched duration period before initiating mexiletine. Patients served as self-controls.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included in the study; 11 patients were males. Mean age was 64.2 ± 15.4 years. The median time of mexiletine treatment was eight months (interquartile range [IR]: 1-22 months). The mexiletine dose was 600 mg/day in 13 patients and 400 mg/day in four patients. In four patients the dose was modified during treatment in a range from 400 to 600 mg/day depending on clinical decision. Treatment with mexiletine significantly reduced the number of electrical storm events (14 episodes vs. two episodes; median and IR for 17 patients: 1 [0-1] vs. 0 [0-0], p = 0.0010), VT/VF episodes (285 vs. 74 episodes; median and IR for 17 patients: 7 [5-27] vs. 0 [0-5], p = 0.0115), and ICD interventions (317 interven-tions vs. nine interventions; median and IR for 17 patients: 10 [5-25] vs. 0 [0-2], p = 0.0006), in comparison with a matched period before initiation of treatment. In 14 out of 17 patients (82%) sufficient tolerability of mexiletine was observed. Only in three (18%) patients severe side effects of mexiletine treatment occurred requiring discontinuation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Mexiletine was a sufficiently tolerated antiarrhythmic drug in short-term treatment of ventricular tachyarrhyth-mias in the studied population. Mexiletine may be effective in the treatment of recurring ventricular tachyarrhythmias or electrical storm events.