Cognitive Science Department, Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University.
PhD Programme in Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Feb;147(2):257-281. doi: 10.1037/xge0000378. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
A battery comprising 4 fluid reasoning tests as well as 13 working memory (WM) tasks that involved storage, recall, updating, binding, and executive control, was applied to 318 adults in order to evaluate the true relationship of reasoning ability and WM capacity (WMC) to insight problem solving, measured using 40 verbal, spatial, math, matchstick, and remote associates problems (insight problems). WMC predicted 51.8% of variance in insight problem solving and virtually explained its almost isomorphic link to reasoning ability (84.6% of shared variance). The strong link between WMC and insight pertained generally to most WM tasks and insight problems, was identical for problems solved with and without reported insight, was linear throughout the ability levels, and was not mediated by age, motivation, anxiety, psychoticism, and openness to experience. In contrast to popular views on the sudden and holistic nature of insight, the solving of insight problems results primarily from typical operations carried out by the basic WM mechanisms that are responsible for the maintenance, retrieval, transformation, and control of information in the broad range of intellectual tasks (including fluid reasoning). Little above and beyond WM is unique about insight. (PsycINFO Database Record
一个由 4 个流体推理测试和 13 个工作记忆 (WM) 任务组成的电池组被应用于 318 名成年人,以评估推理能力和 WM 能力 (WMC) 与洞察力问题解决的真正关系,这些问题使用 40 个言语、空间、数学、火柴和远程联想问题 (洞察力问题) 进行衡量。WMC 预测了洞察力问题解决的 51.8%的方差,并且几乎解释了它与推理能力的几乎同构联系 (84.6%的共享方差)。WMC 和洞察力之间的紧密联系通常适用于大多数 WM 任务和洞察力问题,对于有和没有报告洞察力的问题都是一样的,在整个能力水平上都是线性的,并且不受年龄、动机、焦虑、精神病态和经验开放性的影响。与关于洞察力的突然和整体性质的流行观点相反,洞察力问题的解决主要来自于基本 WM 机制执行的典型操作,这些操作负责在广泛的智力任务 (包括流体推理) 中维护、检索、转换和控制信息。除了 WM 之外,洞察力没有什么独特之处。