Bennett Stephanie L, Goubran Rafik, Knoefel Frank
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:3835-3839. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037693.
Non-contact methods of extracting vital signals has become a popular area of research. This is likely due to the world's aging population and the increased need for long term and remote monitoring. This paper examines and compares the potential for one modality to capture a vital sign, specifically respiration, in the presence of signal abnormalities. This paper compares temperature based-methods to motion-based methods of extracting respiration rate from thermal video of a subject performing computationally difficult respiration tests. The thermal video was subjected to segmentation-based image processing and region tracking to encompass temperature changes over time. All methods were successful in identifying regular breathing and the absence of breathing, but differed in performance identifying hyperventilation and obstructive sleep apnea simulated breathing. The temperature-based method better depicted airflow volume, while the motion-based method better depicted absence of breath and chest movement; neither signal on its own was able to accurately depict OSA breathing. These results suggest that the fusion of information from different physical phenomenon (i.e. motion and temperature) is important here in detecting abnormal breathing patterns, but also in the detection of all vital signals, adding algorithmic robustness in the presence of signal abnormalities.
提取生命体征的非接触式方法已成为一个热门研究领域。这可能是由于全球人口老龄化以及对长期和远程监测的需求增加。本文研究并比较了一种模态在存在信号异常的情况下捕捉生命体征(特别是呼吸)的潜力。本文将基于温度的方法与基于运动的方法进行比较,这些方法是从进行计算困难的呼吸测试的受试者的热视频中提取呼吸速率。对热视频进行基于分割的图像处理和区域跟踪,以涵盖随时间的温度变化。所有方法在识别正常呼吸和无呼吸方面均取得成功,但在识别过度换气和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停模拟呼吸方面的性能有所不同。基于温度的方法能更好地描绘气流体积,而基于运动的方法能更好地描绘无呼吸和胸部运动;单独的任何一种信号都无法准确描绘阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停呼吸。这些结果表明,来自不同物理现象(即运动和温度)的信息融合在此处对于检测异常呼吸模式很重要,而且对于检测所有生命体征也很重要,在存在信号异常的情况下增加了算法的稳健性。