Ahlborg Mikael, Svedberg Petra, Nyholm Maria, Morgan Antony, Nygren Jens M
School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, SE 301 18, Halmstad, Sweden.
Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4863-x.
Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health predict future inequalities in adult health. Subjective measures of socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute with an increased understanding of these inequalities. The aim of this study was to investigate socioeconomic health inequalities using both a subjective and an objective measure of SES among Swedish adolescents.
Cross-sectional HBSC-data from 2002 to 2014 was used with a total sample of 23,088 adolescents aged 11-15 years. Three measures of self-rated health (dependent variables) were assessed: multiple health complaints, life satisfaction and health perception. SES was measured objectively by the Family Affluence Scale (FAS) and subjectively by "perceived family wealth" (independent variables). The trend for health inequalities was investigated descriptively with independent t-tests and the relationship between independent and dependent variables was investigated with multiple logistic regression analysis. Gender, age and survey year was considered as possible confounders.
Subjective SES was more strongly related to health outcomes than the objective measure (FAS). Also, the relation between FAS and health was weakened and even reversed (for multiple health complaints) when subjective SES was tested simultaneously in regression models (FAS OR: 1.03, CI: 1.00;1.06 and subjective SES OR: 0.66, CI: 0.63;0.68).
The level of socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health varied depending on which measure that was used to define SES. When focusing on adolescents, the subjective appraisals of SES is important to consider because they seem to provide a stronger tool for identifying inequalities in health for this group. This finding is important for policy makers to consider given the persistence of health inequalities in Sweden and other high-income countries.
青少年健康方面的社会经济不平等预示着未来成人健康方面的不平等。社会经济地位(SES)的主观衡量指标可能有助于加深对这些不平等现象的理解。本研究的目的是使用瑞典青少年SES的主观和客观衡量指标来调查社会经济健康不平等情况。
使用2002年至2014年的横断面健康行为学校儿童健康状况调查(HBSC)数据,样本总数为23,088名11至15岁的青少年。评估了三种自评健康指标(因变量):多种健康问题、生活满意度和健康感知。SES通过家庭富裕量表(FAS)进行客观测量,并通过“感知家庭财富”进行主观测量(自变量)。使用独立t检验对健康不平等趋势进行描述性调查,并使用多元逻辑回归分析研究自变量和因变量之间的关系。将性别、年龄和调查年份视为可能的混杂因素。
主观SES比客观指标(FAS)与健康结果的相关性更强。此外,在回归模型中同时检验主观SES时,FAS与健康之间的关系减弱甚至逆转(对于多种健康问题)(FAS优势比:1.03,置信区间:1.00;1.06;主观SES优势比:0.66,置信区间:0.63;0.68)。
青少年健康方面的社会经济不平等程度因用于定义SES的测量指标而异。在关注青少年时,SES的主观评估很重要,因为它们似乎为识别该群体的健康不平等提供了更强有力的工具。鉴于瑞典和其他高收入国家健康不平等现象持续存在,这一发现对政策制定者来说很重要,值得考虑。