Cosylab, Control System Laboratory, Gerbičeva ulica 64, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška 25, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Feb;13(2):193-202. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1678-2. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
Image guidance for minimally invasive surgery is based on spatial co-registration and fusion of 3D pre-interventional images and treatment plans with the 2D live intra-interventional images. The spatial co-registration or 3D-2D registration is the key enabling technology; however, the performance of state-of-the-art automated methods is rather unclear as they have not been assessed under the same test conditions. Herein we perform a quantitative and comparative evaluation of ten state-of-the-art methods for 3D-2D registration on a public dataset of clinical angiograms.
Image database consisted of 3D and 2D angiograms of 25 patients undergoing treatment for cerebral aneurysms or arteriovenous malformations. On each of the datasets, highly accurate "gold-standard" registrations of 3D and 2D images were established based on patient-attached fiducial markers. The database was used to rigorously evaluate ten state-of-the-art 3D-2D registration methods, namely two intensity-, two gradient-, three feature-based and three hybrid methods, both for registration of 3D pre-interventional image to monoplane or biplane 2D images.
Intensity-based methods were most accurate in all tests (0.3 mm). One of the hybrid methods was most robust with 98.75% of successful registrations (SR) and capture range of 18 mm for registrations of 3D to biplane 2D angiograms. In general, registration accuracy was similar whether registration of 3D image was performed onto mono- or biplanar 2D images; however, the SR was substantially lower in case of 3D to monoplane 2D registration. Two feature-based and two hybrid methods had clinically feasible execution times in the order of a second.
Performance of methods seems to fall below expectations in terms of robustness in case of registration of 3D to monoplane 2D images, while translation into clinical image guidance systems seems readily feasible for methods that perform registration of the 3D pre-interventional image onto biplanar intra-interventional 2D images.
微创手术的图像引导基于三维术前图像和治疗计划与二维实时术中图像的空间配准和融合。空间配准或三维到二维配准是关键的使能技术;然而,由于尚未在相同的测试条件下进行评估,最先进的自动化方法的性能尚不清楚。在此,我们在一个临床血管造影公共数据集上对十种最先进的三维到二维配准方法进行了定量和比较评估。
图像数据库由 25 名接受脑动脉瘤或动静脉畸形治疗的患者的三维和二维血管造影组成。在每个数据集上,基于患者附着的基准标记,建立了三维和二维图像的高度精确的“金标准”配准。该数据库用于严格评估十种最先进的三维到二维配准方法,即两种基于强度的方法、两种基于梯度的方法、三种基于特征的方法和三种基于混合的方法,用于将三维术前图像配准到单平面或双平面二维图像。
在所有测试中,基于强度的方法最准确(0.3 毫米)。一种混合方法最稳健,98.75%的配准成功率(SR)和 18 毫米的捕获范围,用于将三维配准到双平面二维血管造影。一般来说,无论将三维图像配准到单平面还是双平面二维图像,配准精度都相似;然而,在将三维配准到单平面二维图像的情况下,SR 要低得多。两种基于特征的方法和两种混合方法的执行时间在一秒钟以内,具有临床可行性。
在将三维图像配准到单平面二维图像的情况下,方法的性能似乎低于预期的稳健性,而对于将三维术前图像配准到双平面术中二维图像的方法,将其转化为临床图像引导系统似乎是可行的。