Chen Lipeng, Borrelli Raffaele, Zhao Yang
Division of Materials Science, Nanyang Technological University , 639798, Singapore.
Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Science, Universitá di Torino , I-10095 Grugliasco, Turin, Italy.
J Phys Chem A. 2017 Nov 22;121(46):8757-8770. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b07069. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
The dynamics of a coupled electron-boson system is investigated by employing a multitude of the Davydov D trial states, also known as the multi-D Ansatz, and a second trial state based on a superposition of the time-dependent generalized coherent state (GCS Ansatz). The two Ansätze are applied to study population dynamics in the spin-boson model and the Holstein molecular crystal model, and a detailed comparison with numerically exact results obtained by the (multilayer) multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree method and the hierarchy equations of motion approach is drawn. It is found that the two methodologies proposed here have significantly improved over that with the single D Ansatz, yielding quantitatively accurate results even in the critical cases of large energy biases and large transfer integrals. The two methodologies provide new effective tools for accurate, efficient simulation of many-body quantum dynamics thanks to a relatively small number of parameters which characterize the electron-nuclear wave functions. The wave-function-based approaches are capable of tracking explicitly detailed bosonic dynamics, which is absent by construct in approaches based on the reduced density matrix. The efficiency and flexibility of our methods are also advantages as compared with numerically exact approaches such as QUAPI and HEOM, especially at low temperatures and in the strong coupling regime.
通过采用多种达维多夫D试探态(也称为多D近似)以及基于含时广义相干态叠加的第二种试探态(GCS近似),研究了耦合电子 - 玻色子系统的动力学。将这两种近似应用于研究自旋 - 玻色子模型和霍斯坦分子晶体模型中的布居动力学,并与通过(多层)多组态含时哈特里方法和运动方程层级方法获得的数值精确结果进行了详细比较。结果发现,这里提出的两种方法比单一D近似有显著改进,即使在大能量偏差和大转移积分的临界情况下也能产生定量准确的结果。这两种方法为精确、高效地模拟多体量子动力学提供了新的有效工具,这得益于表征电子 - 核波函数的参数数量相对较少。基于波函数的方法能够明确跟踪详细的玻色子动力学,而基于约化密度矩阵的方法则没有这种动力学。与数值精确方法(如QUAPI和HEOM)相比,我们方法的效率和灵活性也是优势,特别是在低温和强耦合 regime。 (注:原文中“strong coupling regime”未翻译完整,可能是“强耦合区域”之类的表述,这里保留原文以便你核对。)