Università Federico II, Naples, Italy.
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):188-199. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01201. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
Although the role of the cerebellum in motor function is well recognized, its involvement in the lexical domain remains to be further elucidated. Indeed, it has not yet been clarified whether the cerebellum is a language structure per se or whether it contributes to language processing when other cognitive components (e.g., cognitive effort, working memory) are required by the language task. Neuromodulation studies on healthy participants have suggested that cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a valuable tool to modulate cognitive functions. However, so far, only a single case study has investigated whether cerebellar stimulation enhances language recovery in aphasic individuals. In a randomized, crossover, double-blind design, we explored the effect of cerebellar tDCS coupled with language treatment for verb improvement in 12 aphasic individuals. Each participant received cerebellar tDCS (20 min, 2 mA) in four experimental conditions: (1) right cathodal and (2) sham stimulation during a verb generation task and (3) right cathodal and (4) sham stimulation during a verb naming task. Each experimental condition was run in five consecutive daily sessions over 4 weeks. At the end of treatment, a significant improvement was found after cathodal stimulation only in the verb generation task. No significant differences were present for verb naming among the two conditions. We hypothesize that cerebellar tDCS is a viable tool for recovery from aphasia but only when the language task, such as verb generation, also demands the activation of nonlinguistic strategies.
虽然小脑在运动功能中的作用已得到广泛认可,但它在词汇领域的作用仍有待进一步阐明。事实上,目前还不清楚小脑本身是否是一种语言结构,或者在语言任务需要其他认知成分(例如认知努力、工作记忆)时,它是否有助于语言处理。对健康参与者的神经调节研究表明,小脑经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是调节认知功能的一种有价值的工具。然而,到目前为止,只有一项单病例研究探讨了小脑刺激是否能增强失语症个体的语言恢复。在一项随机、交叉、双盲设计中,我们探讨了小脑 tDCS 联合语言治疗对 12 名失语症患者动词改善的影响。每位参与者在四个实验条件下接受小脑 tDCS(20 分钟,2 mA):(1)动词生成任务中的右阴极和(2)假刺激,以及(3)动词命名任务中的右阴极和(4)假刺激。每个实验条件在 4 周内连续进行 5 天。在治疗结束时,只有在动词生成任务中进行阴极刺激后才发现显著改善。在动词命名任务中,两种条件之间没有显著差异。我们假设小脑 tDCS 是治疗失语症的一种可行工具,但前提是语言任务(如动词生成)也需要激活非语言策略。