Rotherham Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Moorgate Road, S60 2UD, UK; Sheffield Shoulder Physio, Remedy House, Wilkinson Street, S102GB, UK; Hodgson Physiotherapy Services, Sandal, WF27DY, UK.
Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences and Keele Clinical Trials Unit, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST55BG, UK.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Feb;33:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Structured exercise has been reported as the current treatment of choice for patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). However, it has been suggested that this diagnostic term and the language used to explain this condition might negatively influence patient expectations and serve as a barrier to engagement with exercise, hence compromising clinical outcomes.
To explore how patients rationalise their shoulder pain following a diagnosis of SIS and how this understanding might impact on their perception of physiotherapy and engagement with exercise.
A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and analysed using the Framework method.
One NHS Physiotherapy department in South Yorkshire, England.
Nine patients diagnosed with SIS were purposively sampled from those referred to the outpatient physiotherapy department by the orthopaedic team (consultant surgeons and registrars).
Three main themes were generated: (1) The diagnostic experience, (2) Understanding of the problem, (3) Expectation of the treatment required; with one subtheme: (3b) Barriers to engagement with physiotherapy.
The findings from this study suggest that diagnosis of shoulder pain remains grounded in a biomedical model. Understanding and explaining pain using the subacromial impingement model seems acceptable to patients but might have significant implications for engagement with and success of physiotherapy. It is suggested that clinicians should be mindful of the terminology they use and consider its impact on the patient's treatment pathway with the aim of doing no harm with the language used.
有报道称,结构性锻炼是目前诊断为肩峰下撞击综合征(SIS)患者的首选治疗方法。然而,有人认为这个诊断术语和用来解释这种情况的语言可能会对患者的期望产生负面影响,并成为他们参与锻炼的障碍,从而影响临床效果。
探讨患者在被诊断为 SIS 后如何合理化他们的肩部疼痛,以及这种理解如何影响他们对物理治疗的看法和参与锻炼的意愿。
一项使用半结构式访谈的定性研究,并使用框架方法进行分析。
英格兰南约克郡的一家 NHS 物理治疗部门。
从骨科团队(顾问外科医生和住院医生)转诊到门诊物理治疗部门的 SIS 患者中,通过目的性抽样选择了 9 名患者。
生成了三个主要主题:(1)诊断经历,(2)对问题的理解,(3)对所需治疗的期望;有一个子主题:(3b)参与物理治疗的障碍。
这项研究的结果表明,肩部疼痛的诊断仍然基于生物医学模型。使用肩峰下撞击模型来理解和解释疼痛对患者来说是可以接受的,但这可能对他们参与和接受物理治疗的效果产生重大影响。因此,临床医生应该注意他们使用的术语,并考虑其对患者治疗途径的影响,目的是避免语言带来的伤害。