• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生对阿尔茨海默病诊断测试中对话及共同决策的看法:ABIDE项目

Clinicians' views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease: The ABIDE project.

作者信息

Kunneman Marleen, Smets Ellen M A, Bouwman Femke H, Schoonenboom Niki S M, Zwan Marissa D, Pel-Littel Ruth, van der Flier Wiesje M

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 May 10;3(3):305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.009. eCollection 2017 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.009
PMID:29067337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5651435/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study explores clinicians' views on and experiences with when, how, and by whom decisions about diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease are made and how test results are discussed with patients.

METHODS

Following a preparatory focus group with 13 neurologists and geriatricians, we disseminated an online questionnaire among 200 memory clinic clinicians.

RESULTS

Respondents were 95 neurologists and geriatricians (response rate 47.5%). Clinicians (74%) indicated that decisions about testing are made before the first encounter, yet they favored a shared decision-making approach. Patient involvement seems limited to receiving information. Clinicians with less tolerance for uncertainty preferred a bigger say in decisions ( < .05). Clinicians indicated to always communicate the diagnosis (94%), results of different tests (88%-96%), and risk of developing dementia (66%).

DISCUSSION

Clinicians favor patient involvement in deciding about diagnostic testing, but conversations about decisions and test results can be improved and supported.

摘要

引言

本研究探讨临床医生对于何时、如何以及由谁做出阿尔茨海默病诊断检测决策,以及如何与患者讨论检测结果的看法和经验。

方法

在与13名神经科医生和老年科医生进行预备性焦点小组讨论之后,我们在200名记忆门诊临床医生中发放了一份在线问卷。

结果

95名神经科医生和老年科医生回复了问卷(回复率47.5%)。临床医生(74%)表示检测决策在首次就诊前就已做出,但他们倾向于采用共同决策的方法。患者的参与似乎仅限于接收信息。对不确定性容忍度较低的临床医生在决策中希望有更大的话语权(P<0.05)。临床医生表示总是会告知患者诊断结果(94%)、不同检测的结果(88%-96%)以及患痴呆症的风险(66%)。

讨论

临床医生支持患者参与诊断检测的决策,但关于决策和检测结果的沟通可以得到改善和支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfd5/5651435/9b7afac02bba/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfd5/5651435/7f8c2001b395/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfd5/5651435/9b7afac02bba/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfd5/5651435/7f8c2001b395/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfd5/5651435/9b7afac02bba/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinicians' views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease: The ABIDE project.临床医生对阿尔茨海默病诊断测试中对话及共同决策的看法:ABIDE项目
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 May 10;3(3):305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.009. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
Patients' and caregivers' views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease: The ABIDE project.患者及照护者对阿尔茨海默病诊断检测中对话及共同决策的看法:ABIDE项目
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 May 10;3(3):314-322. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.04.002. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Communicating uncertainties when disclosing diagnostic test results for (Alzheimer's) dementia in the memory clinic: The ABIDE project.在记忆诊所中披露(阿尔茨海默病)痴呆诊断测试结果时的不确定性沟通:ABIDE 项目。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):52-62. doi: 10.1111/hex.12964. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
4
Development and Usability of ADappt: Web-Based Tool to Support Clinicians, Patients, and Caregivers in the Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease.ADappt的开发与可用性:用于支持临床医生、患者及护理人员诊断轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病的基于网络的工具
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Jul 8;3(3):e13417. doi: 10.2196/13417.
5
Blood tests in primary care: A qualitative study of communication and decision-making between doctors and patients.基层医疗中的血液检测:医生与患者间沟通和决策的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2453-2461. doi: 10.1111/hex.13564. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project.诊断检查期间的医患沟通:ABIDE项目。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019 Jul 29;11:520-528. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: a qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making.保守治疗的肾衰竭老年人的观点和体验:沟通、信息和决策的定性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Feb 4;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4.
8
Clinicians' communication with patients receiving a MCI diagnosis: The ABIDE project.临床医生与接受 MCI 诊断的患者的沟通:ABIDE 项目。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0227282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227282. eCollection 2020.
9
10
Alzheimer's biomarkers in daily practice (ABIDE) project: Rationale and design.日常实践中的阿尔茨海默病生物标志物(ABIDE)项目:原理与设计
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Jan 23;6:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.01.003. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
[Alzheimer's and Its Diagnosis: Are We Prepared to Accompany Our Patients? Shared Care Planning as a Relational Framework].[阿尔茨海默病及其诊断:我们准备好陪伴患者了吗?将共享护理计划作为一种关系框架]
Rev Neurol. 2025 May 26;80(4):42462. doi: 10.31083/RN42462.
2
Exploring interdisciplinary perspectives on the implementation of and in Alzheimer's disease: A qualitative study within the ABOARD research project.探索阿尔茨海默病中[具体内容缺失]实施的跨学科视角:ABOARD研究项目中的一项定性研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 May;105(1):120-133. doi: 10.1177/13872877251326166. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Predicting Cognitive Decline in Amyloid-Positive Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Mild Dementia.

本文引用的文献

1
Alzheimer's biomarkers in daily practice (ABIDE) project: Rationale and design.日常实践中的阿尔茨海默病生物标志物(ABIDE)项目:原理与设计
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Jan 23;6:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.01.003. eCollection 2017.
2
Tolerating Uncertainty - The Next Medical Revolution?容忍不确定性——下一场医学革命?
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 3;375(18):1713-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1606402.
3
What Is Shared Decision Making? (and What It Is Not).什么是共同决策?(以及它不是什么)。
预测伴有轻度认知障碍或轻度痴呆的淀粉样蛋白阳性患者的认知能力下降。
Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209605. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209605. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
4
Use of a digital tool to support the diagnostic process in memory clinics-a usability study.使用数字工具支持记忆诊所的诊断过程-一项可用性研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Apr 8;16(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01433-8.
5
The expectations and experiences of patients regarding the diagnostic workup at a specialized memory clinic: An interview study.患者对专科记忆门诊诊断检查的期望和体验:一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14021. doi: 10.1111/hex.14021.
6
Online clinical tools to support the use of new plasma biomarker diagnostic technology in the assessment of Alzheimer's disease: a narrative review.支持新型血浆生物标志物诊断技术用于阿尔茨海默病评估的在线临床工具:一项叙述性综述
Brain Commun. 2023 Nov 24;5(6):fcad322. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad322. eCollection 2023.
7
Communication about diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention in the memory clinic: perspectives of European memory clinic professionals.在记忆诊所中关于诊断、预后和预防的沟通:欧洲记忆诊所专业人员的观点。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Aug 5;15(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01276-9.
8
Identifying best practices for disclosure of amyloid imaging results: A randomized controlled trial.确定淀粉样蛋白成像结果披露的最佳实践:一项随机对照试验。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Jan;19(1):285-295. doi: 10.1002/alz.12630. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
9
Dementia risk communication. A user manual for Brain Health Services-part 3 of 6.痴呆风险沟通。脑健康服务用户手册-第 6 部分的第 3 部分。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 Oct 11;13(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00840-5.
10
Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?确定阿尔茨海默病进展中的相关结果;患者和护理伙伴想了解哪些关于预后的信息?
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Aug 20;7(1):e12189. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12189. eCollection 2021.
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(12):1320-1324. doi: 10.1111/acem.13065. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
4
Shared decision-making as an existential journey: Aiming for restored autonomous capacity.作为一种生存之旅的共同决策:旨在恢复自主能力。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Sep;99(9):1505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
5
Shared Decision Making: The Need For Patient-Clinician Conversation, Not Just Information.共同决策:需要医患对话,而非仅仅提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):627-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1354.
6
Mild Cognitive Impairment.轻度认知障碍
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Apr;22(2 Dementia):404-18. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000313.
7
Shared Decision Making--Finding the Sweet Spot.共同决策——找到最佳平衡点。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):104-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1510020.
8
Deciding about (neo-)adjuvant rectal and breast cancer treatment: Missed opportunities for shared decision making.关于直肠癌和乳腺癌(新)辅助治疗的决策:共享决策的错失机遇。
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(2):134-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1068447. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Shared decision-making in dementia: A review of patient and family carer involvement.痴呆症的共同决策:患者和家属参与情况综述。
Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):1141-57. doi: 10.1177/1471301214555542. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
10
How are decisions on care services for people with dementia made and experienced? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of recent empirical findings.针对痴呆症患者的护理服务决策是如何做出的以及人们对此有何体验?近期实证研究结果的系统评价与质性综合分析
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Nov;26(11):1849-62. doi: 10.1017/S104161021400132X. Epub 2014 Jul 15.