Division of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital & Anglia Ruskin University, Westcliff-on-sea, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Sep 1;57(9):1513-1524. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex385.
GCA shares many clinical features with PMR and Takayasu arteritis. The current mainstay of therapy for all three conditions is glucocorticoid therapy. Given the chronic, relapsing nature of these conditions and the morbidity associated with glucocorticoid therapy, there is a need for better treatment options to induce and sustain remission with fewer adverse effects. Conventional immunosuppressive treatments have been studied and have a modest effect. There is a keen interest in biologic therapies with studies showing the efficacy of IL-6 antagonists in PMR and GCA. Recently the first two randomized clinical trials in Takayasu arteritis have been completed. A major challenge for all of these conditions is the lack of standardized measures to assess disease activity. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the impact of biologic therapies showing potential on important clinical outcomes such as vascular damage, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. The optimal duration of treatment also needs to be assessed.
巨细胞动脉炎与多发性肌炎/皮肌炎和 Takayasu 动脉炎有许多临床特征。目前,所有这三种疾病的主要治疗方法都是糖皮质激素治疗。鉴于这些疾病具有慢性、复发性的特点,以及糖皮质激素治疗相关的发病率,我们需要更好的治疗选择,以更少的不良反应诱导和维持缓解。已经研究了传统的免疫抑制治疗方法,但效果有限。人们对生物治疗方法非常感兴趣,研究表明白细胞介素 6 拮抗剂对多发性肌炎/皮肌炎和巨细胞动脉炎有效。最近,Takayasu 动脉炎的两项首次随机临床试验已经完成。所有这些疾病的一个主要挑战是缺乏评估疾病活动的标准化措施。需要进行长期研究,以评估显示出潜在疗效的生物治疗方法对重要临床结局(如血管损伤、成本效益和生活质量)的影响。还需要评估最佳治疗持续时间。