• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利切普拉诺颅骨的数字重建及其解读意义

Digital reconstruction of the Ceprano calvarium (Italy), and implications for its interpretation.

作者信息

Di Vincenzo Fabio, Profico Antonio, Bernardini Federico, Cerroni Vittorio, Dreossi Diego, Schlager Stefan, Zaio Paola, Benazzi Stefano, Biddittu Italo, Rubini Mauro, Tuniz Claudio, Manzi Giorgio

机构信息

Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.

Istituto Italiano di Paleontologia Umana, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 25;7(1):13974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14437-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14437-2
PMID:29070804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5656598/
Abstract

The Ceprano calvarium was discovered in fragments on March 1994 near the town of Ceprano in southern Latium (Italy), embedded in Middle Pleistocene layers. After reconstruction, its morphological features suggests that the specimen belongs to an archaic variant of H. heidelbergensis, representing a proxy for the last common ancestor of the diverging clades that respectively led to H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens. Unfortunately, the calvarium was taphonomically damaged. The postero-lateral vault, in particular, appears deformed and this postmortem damage may have influenced previous interpretations. Specifically, there is a depression on the fragmented left parietal, while the right cranial wall is warped and angulated. This deformation affected the shape of the occipital squama, producing an inclination of the transverse occipital torus. In this paper, after X-ray microtomography (μCT) of both the calvarium and several additional fragments, we analyze consistency and pattern of the taphonomic deformation that affected the specimen, before the computer-assisted retrodeformation has been performed; this has also provided the opportunity to reappraise early attempts at restoration. As a result, we offer a revised interpretation for the Ceprano calvarium's original shape, now free from the previous uncertainties, along with insight for its complex depositional and taphonomic history.

摘要

1994年3月,在意大利拉齐奥南部的切普拉诺镇附近发现了切普拉诺颅骨碎片,其嵌于中更新世地层中。重建后,其形态特征表明该标本属于海德堡人(H. heidelbergensis)的一个古老变种,代表了分别导致尼安德特人(H. neanderthalensis)和智人(H. sapiens)的分化分支的最后一个共同祖先的代表。不幸的是,该颅骨在埋藏学上受到了损坏。特别是后外侧穹顶看起来变形了,这种死后损伤可能影响了先前的解释。具体而言,破碎的左顶骨上有一个凹陷,而右侧颅壁扭曲且有角度。这种变形影响了枕鳞的形状,导致枕横嵴倾斜。在本文中,在对该颅骨和其他几块碎片进行X射线显微断层扫描(μCT)之后,我们在进行计算机辅助逆向变形之前,分析了影响该标本的埋藏学变形的一致性和模式;这也为重新评估早期的修复尝试提供了机会。结果,我们对切普拉诺颅骨的原始形状给出了一个经过修订的解释,现在已摆脱了先前的不确定性,同时还对其复杂的沉积和埋藏历史有了深入了解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/d8b374c61d62/41598_2017_14437_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/82acaf2cd80f/41598_2017_14437_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/2e6ef7972276/41598_2017_14437_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/030c30cd9017/41598_2017_14437_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/1c6ebc2f45dc/41598_2017_14437_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/ae6a1e66ef6d/41598_2017_14437_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/529bc0eff893/41598_2017_14437_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/d8b374c61d62/41598_2017_14437_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/82acaf2cd80f/41598_2017_14437_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/2e6ef7972276/41598_2017_14437_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/030c30cd9017/41598_2017_14437_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/1c6ebc2f45dc/41598_2017_14437_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/ae6a1e66ef6d/41598_2017_14437_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/529bc0eff893/41598_2017_14437_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1c5/5656598/d8b374c61d62/41598_2017_14437_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital reconstruction of the Ceprano calvarium (Italy), and implications for its interpretation.意大利切普拉诺颅骨的数字重建及其解读意义
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 25;7(1):13974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14437-2.
2
CT-based description and phyletic evaluation of the archaic human calvarium from Ceprano, Italy.基于CT的意大利切普拉诺古人类头盖骨描述与系统发育评估。
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2005 Jul;285(1):643-58. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.20205.
3
Landmark-based shape analysis of the archaic Homo calvarium from Ceprano (Italy).基于地标点的意大利切普拉诺古人类头盖骨形状分析。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Mar;132(3):355-66. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20545.
4
A cranium for the earliest Europeans: phylogenetic position of the hominid from Ceprano, Italy.最早欧洲人的颅骨:意大利切普拉诺原始人类的系统发育位置。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Aug 14;98(17):10011-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151259998.
5
The new chronology of the Ceprano calvarium (Italy).切普拉诺颅骨(意大利)的新年代学
J Hum Evol. 2010 Nov;59(5):580-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
6
On the trail of the genus Homo between archaic and derived morphologies.追寻介于古老形态和衍生形态之间的人属足迹。
J Anthropol Sci. 2012;90:99-116. doi: 10.4436/jass.90018.
7
The stem species of our species: a place for the archaic human cranium from Ceprano, Italy.我们人类物种的主干物种:意大利切普拉诺出土的古老人类颅骨所处的位置。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 20;6(4):e18821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018821.
8
A corrected reconstruction and interpretation of the Homo erectus calvaria from Ceprano, Italy.对来自意大利切普拉诺的直立人头盖骨的修正性重建与解读。
J Hum Evol. 2000 Oct;39(4):433-42. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0426.
9
The skull from Florisbad: a paleoneurological report.弗洛里斯巴德颅骨:一项古神经学报告。
J Anthropol Sci. 2020 Dec 31;98. doi: 10.4436/JASS.98014.
10
Cranial vault shape in fossil hominids: Fourier descriptors in norma lateralis.化石人族颅骨穹窿形状:侧面观的傅里叶描述符
Homo. 2010 Oct;61(5):287-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2010.07.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Candidate Denisovan fossils identified through gene regulatory phenotyping.通过基因调控表型鉴定出的丹尼索瓦人化石候选样本。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Sep 2;122(35):e2513968122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2513968122. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
2
The Middle Pleistocene human metatarsal from Sedia del Diavolo (Rome, Italy).来自意大利罗马迪亚沃洛隘口的中更新世人类跖骨。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 12;14(1):6024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55045-1.
3
Virtual excavation and analysis of the early Neanderthal cranium from Altamura (Italy).虚拟挖掘和分析来自意大利阿尔塔米拉的早期尼安德特人头骨。

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic Modelling of Tooth Deformation Using Occlusal Kinematics and Finite Element Analysis.利用咬合运动学和有限元分析对牙齿变形进行动态建模
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152663. eCollection 2016.
2
Filling the gap. Human cranial remains from Gombore II (Melka Kunture, Ethiopia; ca. 850 ka) and the origin of Homo heidelbergensis.填补空白。来自贡博雷二号(埃塞俄比亚梅尔卡昆图雷;约85万年前)的人类颅骨遗骸与海德堡人的起源。
J Anthropol Sci. 2016 Jun 20;94:41-63. doi: 10.4436/JASS.94019. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
3
Neandertal roots: Cranial and chronological evidence from Sima de los Huesos.
Commun Biol. 2023 Mar 24;6(1):316. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04644-1.
4
One step further in biomechanical models in palaeontology: a nonlinear finite element analysis review.古生物学中生物力学模型的进一步研究:非线性有限元分析综述。
PeerJ. 2022 Aug 8;10:e13890. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13890. eCollection 2022.
5
Protocol for the reconstruction of micromammals from fossils. Two case studies: The skulls of Beremendia fissidens and Dolinasorex glyphodon.重建化石中小哺乳动物的方法。两个案例研究:Beremendia fissidens 和 Dolinasorex glyphodon 的头骨。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0213174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213174. eCollection 2019.
6
X-ray computed microtomography of Megachirella wachtleri.对巨栉龙的 X 射线计算机微断层扫描。
Sci Data. 2018 Nov 6;5:180244. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.244.
7
Retrodeformation of fossil specimens based on 3D bilateral semi-landmarks: Implementation in the R package "Morpho".基于 3D 双侧半标志点的化石标本反向变形:在 R 包“Morpho”中的实现。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 19;13(3):e0194073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194073. eCollection 2018.
尼安德特人的根源:来自西玛德洛斯胡埃斯的颅骨和年代证据。
Science. 2014 Jun 20;344(6190):1358-63. doi: 10.1126/science.1253958.
4
Technical note: virtual reconstruction of KNM-ER 1813 Homo habilis cranium.技术说明:能人 KNM-ER 1813 颅骨的虚拟重建。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Jan;153(1):154-60. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22376. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
5
On the trail of the genus Homo between archaic and derived morphologies.追寻介于古老形态和衍生形态之间的人属足迹。
J Anthropol Sci. 2012;90:99-116. doi: 10.4436/jass.90018.
6
Analyzing taphonomic deformation of ankylosaur skulls using retrodeformation and finite element analysis.利用反变形和有限元分析分析甲龙类头骨的埋藏变形。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039323. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
7
The status of Homo heidelbergensis (Schoetensack 1908).海德堡人(舍滕斯扎克 1908 年)的现状。
Evol Anthropol. 2012 May;21(3):101-7. doi: 10.1002/evan.21311.
8
Comparing 3D virtual methods for hemimandibular body reconstruction.比较用于下颌体半侧重建的 3D 虚拟方法。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2011 Jul;294(7):1116-25. doi: 10.1002/ar.21410. Epub 2011 May 25.
9
The stem species of our species: a place for the archaic human cranium from Ceprano, Italy.我们人类物种的主干物种:意大利切普拉诺出土的古老人类颅骨所处的位置。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 20;6(4):e18821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018821.
10
A new OH5 reconstruction with an assessment of its uncertainty.一种新的 OH5 重建及其不确定性评估。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Jul;61(1):75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 3.