• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉药物对食管癌手术患者总生存和无复发生存的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。

Impact of anesthetic agents on overall and recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: A retrospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 25;7(1):14020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14147-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14147-9
PMID:29070852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5656640/
Abstract

Given that surgical stress response and surgical excision may increase the likelihood of post-surgery cancer dissemination and metastasis, the appropriate choice of surgical anesthetics may be important for oncologic outcomes. We evaluated the association of anesthetics used for general anesthesia with overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery. Adult patients (922) underwent elective esophageal cancer surgery were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthetics administered during surgery: volatile anesthesia (VA) or intravenous anesthesia with propofol (TIVA). Propensity score and Cox regression analyses were performed. There were 191 patients in the VA group and 731 in the TIVA group. In the entire cohort, VA was independently associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.24-2.01; P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.12-1.79; P = 0.003) after multivariable analysis adjustment. Similarly, in the propensity score matched cohorts, VA was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.45; 95% CI 1.11-1.89; P = 0.006) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.11-1.87; P = 0.006). TIVA during esophageal cancer surgery was associated with better postoperative survival rates compared with volatile anesthesia.

摘要

鉴于手术应激反应和手术切除可能增加术后癌症扩散和转移的可能性,因此选择适当的手术麻醉方法对于肿瘤学结果可能很重要。我们评估了全身麻醉中使用的麻醉剂与接受食管癌手术的患者的总生存率和无复发生存率之间的关系。纳入了 922 名接受择期食管癌手术的成年患者。根据手术期间使用的麻醉剂将患者分为两组:挥发性麻醉剂(VA)或异丙酚静脉麻醉(TIVA)。进行了倾向评分和 Cox 回归分析。VA 组有 191 例患者,TIVA 组有 731 例患者。在整个队列中,VA 与总生存率(HR 1.58;95%CI 1.24-2.01;P<0.001)和无复发生存率(HR 1.42;95%CI 1.12-1.79;P=0.003)独立相关。同样,在倾向评分匹配队列中,VA 与总生存率(HR 1.45;95%CI 1.11-1.89;P=0.006)和无复发生存率(HR 1.44;95%CI 1.11-1.87;P=0.006)较差相关。与挥发性麻醉相比,食管癌手术期间使用 TIVA 与术后生存率的提高相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/5656640/2414f2014cfb/41598_2017_14147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/5656640/871949e54ac7/41598_2017_14147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/5656640/d50189afcf12/41598_2017_14147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/5656640/2414f2014cfb/41598_2017_14147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/5656640/871949e54ac7/41598_2017_14147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/5656640/d50189afcf12/41598_2017_14147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087e/5656640/2414f2014cfb/41598_2017_14147_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of anesthetic agents on overall and recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: A retrospective observational study.麻醉药物对食管癌手术患者总生存和无复发生存的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 25;7(1):14020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14147-9.
2
Retrospective analysis of 1-year mortality after gastric cancer surgery: Total intravenous anesthesia versus volatile anesthesia.胃癌手术后 1 年死亡率的回顾性分析:全静脉麻醉与挥发性麻醉。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1111/aas.13414. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in limb-salvage surgery for osteosarcoma: A retrospective analysis.依托咪酯全凭静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉用于骨肉瘤保肢手术的生存结果比较:一项回顾性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30840. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030840.
4
Impact of Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia on Long-term Survival After Cancer Surgery in a Nationwide Cohort.基于丙泊酚的全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对全国队列癌症手术后长期生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):1024-1031. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005568. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia did not improve survival compared to desflurane anesthesia in breast cancer surgery.丙泊酚全静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉相比并未改善乳腺癌手术患者的生存率。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224728. eCollection 2019.
6
Anesthesia-related postoperative oncological surgical outcomes: a comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and volatile anesthesia. A meta-analysis.麻醉相关的术后肿瘤外科手术结局:全静脉麻醉与挥发性麻醉的比较。一项荟萃分析。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Dec;18(4):612-624. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.133916. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
7
Outcomes of intravenous and inhalation anesthesia on patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective observational study.静脉麻醉和吸入麻醉对食管癌手术患者的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 2;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02023-1.
8
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthesia for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity Matching Analysis.接受挥发性麻醉与静脉麻醉的非小细胞肺癌手术患者的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性倾向匹配分析
Cancer Control. 2018 Jan-Mar;25(1):1073274818775360. doi: 10.1177/1073274818775360.
9
The long-term survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients with total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia: a single-center retrospective cohort study.胃癌患者全身静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉的长期生存结局:单中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 10;21(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08946-7.
10
Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries.挥发性麻醉与依托咪酯为基础的全静脉麻醉:回顾性分析接受择期消化道癌症根治性手术患者的图表。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 22;101(29):e29169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029169.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of perioperative anesthesia management-induced immunosuppression on postoperative cancer recurrence and metastasis: a narrative review.围手术期麻醉管理所致免疫抑制对术后癌症复发和转移的影响:一项叙述性综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 13;15:1558652. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1558652. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of anesthesia on tumor perfusion and infiltration during brain tumor neurosurgery.麻醉对脑肿瘤神经外科手术中肿瘤灌注及浸润的影响。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 30;87(7):4201-4208. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003454. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Impact of pediatric anesthesia management on cancer outcomes in children-a narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophageal cancer: Risk factors, genetic association, and treatment.食管癌:危险因素、遗传关联和治疗。
Asian J Surg. 2018 May;41(3):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
2
Immune Modulation by Volatile Anesthetics.挥发性麻醉剂的免疫调节作用
Anesthesiology. 2016 Aug;125(2):399-411. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001195.
3
Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on recurrence and overall survival in patients after modified radical mastectomy: a retrospective study.丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉对改良根治性乳房切除术后患者复发及总生存期的影响:一项回顾性研究
小儿麻醉管理对儿童癌症预后的影响——一篇叙述性综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 4;15:1621620. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1621620. eCollection 2025.
4
Anesthetic Approaches and Their Impact on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review.麻醉方法及其对癌症复发和转移的影响:综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 22;16(24):4269. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244269.
5
Total intravenous or inhalational volatile anaesthesia and survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a Swedish national registry study.全静脉麻醉或吸入挥发性麻醉与结直肠癌手术后的生存率:一项瑞典国家登记研究
Anaesthesia. 2025 Apr;80(4):386-394. doi: 10.1111/anae.16495. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
6
Recurrence-free survival after curative resection of non-small cell lung cancer between inhalational gas anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (GAS TIVA trial): protocol description.吸入性气体麻醉与丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉用于非小细胞肺癌根治性切除术后无复发生存率的比较:一项多中心、随机临床试验(GAS TIVA试验):方案描述
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Jul 23;13(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00436-1.
7
Mechanism of isoflurane‑mediated breast cancer growth .异氟烷介导的乳腺癌生长机制
Oncol Lett. 2024 Apr 30;27(6):287. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14420. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: a narrative review.麻醉与癌症复发:一篇综述
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024 Apr;19(2):94-108. doi: 10.17085/apm.24041. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
9
Are there beneficial effects to hybrid anesthesia*?是否有混合麻醉的有益效果? * hybrid anesthesia:混合麻醉
J Anesth. 2024 Jun;38(3):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03310-y. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
10
Anti-inflammatory potential of remimazolam: A laboratory and clinical investigation.雷米唑仑的抗炎潜力:实验室与临床研究。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Mar;12(3):e1218. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1218.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Apr;69(2):126-32. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.126. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
Effects of Volatile Anesthetics on Mortality and Postoperative Pulmonary and Other Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.挥发性麻醉剂对手术患者死亡率及术后肺部和其他并发症的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Anesthesiology. 2016 Jun;124(6):1230-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001120.
5
Long-term Survival for Patients Undergoing Volatile versus IV Anesthesia for Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.癌症手术中接受挥发性麻醉与静脉麻醉的患者的长期生存:回顾性分析。
Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):69-79. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000936.
6
Sevoflurane promotes the expansion of glioma stem cells through activation of hypoxia-inducible factors in vitro.七氟醚通过体外激活缺氧诱导因子促进神经胶质瘤干细胞的扩增。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 May;114(5):825-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu402. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
7
Prognostic factors in patients with recurrence after complete resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞癌完全切除术后复发患者的预后因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jul;6(7):949-57. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.07.14.
8
Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures.围手术期医学临床有效性研究结局指标的定义和使用标准:欧洲围手术期临床结局(EPCO)定义:欧洲麻醉学会-欧洲重症监护医学学会围手术期结局指标联合工作组声明
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.
9
The choice of anaesthetic--sevoflurane or propofol--and outcome from cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis.麻醉剂的选择——七氟醚或丙泊酚——与癌症手术的结果:一项回顾性分析。
Ups J Med Sci. 2014 Aug;119(3):251-61. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2014.922649. Epub 2014 May 26.
10
Risk factors of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery.食管癌手术患者术后急性肾损伤的危险因素
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):936-42. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Mar 27.