Suppr超能文献

评估希腊痴呆患者的抑郁状况:该使用哪种量表?

Assessing depression in Greek dementia patients: Which scale to use?

作者信息

Mougias A A, Politis A, Mougias M A, Beratis I N, Skapinakis P, Armata Chr, Mavreas V G

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina.

"Nestor" Greek Psychogeriatric Association, Athens.

出版信息

Psychiatriki. 2017 Jul-Sep;28(3):203-210. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2017.283.203.

Abstract

Depression in dementia is known to deteriorate patients' cognitive function and Quality of Life and to increase the burden of care. Although detecting depression in dementia is crucial, there is no gold standard for its screening and diagnosis. We examined the psychometric properties of 3 different scales in detecting depression in dementia. Results will be useful as community services for dementia in the country are developing and the need for reliable detection of depression in dementia patients is urgent. Our sample consisted of 136 Greek dementia patients who consulted a memory clinic. For the diagnosis of depression, DSM-IV criteria for major depression and 3 different depression measures were used: a self-assessment scale (Geriatric Depression Scale; GDS), a caregiver assessment scale (Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Depression; NPI-D) and a clinician rated scale (Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; CSDD). For the evaluation of the screening performance of the three depression scales receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was applied. The DSMIV criteria served as the gold standard method for the diagnosis of major depression. CSDD showed the best psychometric properties for the diagnosis of depression in dementia. The ROC curve analysis revealed that among the three measures, the CSDD had the wider AUC (0.919), second in the width of the AUC was the GDS (0.871), and last was the NPI-D (0.812). The prevalence of depression ranged from 18.4% according to DSM-IV criteria to 42.6% using the NPI-D. Using the GDS (cut off point: 7/8) and the CSDD (cut off point: 6/7), depression was present in 26.9% and 33.1% of the patients, respectively. Correlations between scales used were significant (r from 0.432 to 0.660; p<0.001). Caregivers tend to report more depressive symptoms in dementia compared to patients' and clinicians' ratings. CSDD should be used in specialized centers, but GDS may be an alternative in patients able to complete the assessment. The need to establish valid criteria for the diagnosis of depression in dementia is urgent.

摘要

已知痴呆症患者的抑郁症会使患者的认知功能和生活质量恶化,并增加护理负担。尽管在痴呆症中检测抑郁症至关重要,但目前尚无用于其筛查和诊断的金标准。我们研究了3种不同量表在检测痴呆症患者抑郁症方面的心理测量特性。鉴于该国针对痴呆症的社区服务正在发展,且迫切需要可靠地检测痴呆症患者的抑郁症,研究结果将很有用。我们的样本包括136名到记忆诊所就诊的希腊痴呆症患者。对于抑郁症的诊断,采用了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中重度抑郁症的标准以及3种不同的抑郁测量方法:一种自我评估量表(老年抑郁量表;GDS)、一种照料者评估量表(神经精神科问卷-抑郁;NPI-D)和一种临床医生评定量表(康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表;CSDD)。为了评估这三种抑郁量表的筛查性能,应用了受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析。DSM-IV标准用作重度抑郁症诊断的金标准方法。CSDD在诊断痴呆症患者的抑郁症方面显示出最佳的心理测量特性。ROC曲线分析表明,在这三种测量方法中,CSDD的曲线下面积(AUC)最宽(0.919),其次是GDS(0.871),最后是NPI-D(0.812)。抑郁症的患病率根据DSM-IV标准为18.4%,使用NPI-D时为42.6%。使用GDS(临界值:7/8)和CSDD(临界值:6/7)时,分别有26.9%和33.1%的患者存在抑郁症。所使用量表之间的相关性显著(r从0.432至0.660;p<0.001)。与患者和临床医生的评定相比,照料者倾向于报告痴呆症患者更多的抑郁症状。CSDD应在专业中心使用,但对于能够完成评估的患者,GDS可能是一种替代方法。迫切需要建立痴呆症患者抑郁症诊断的有效标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验