• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Explaining the effects of a decision intervention on mammography intentions: The roles of worry, fear and perceived susceptibility to breast cancer.解释决策干预对乳房 X 光检查意向的影响:担忧、恐惧和对乳腺癌易感性的作用。
Psychol Health. 2018 May;33(5):682-700. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1387261. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
2
Effects of a risk-based online mammography intervention on accuracy of perceived risk and mammography intentions.基于风险的在线乳房X光检查干预对感知风险准确性和乳房X光检查意愿的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1647-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 4.
3
Structural equation modeling for implementation intentions, cancer worry, and stages of mammography adoption.实施意图、癌症担忧与乳房X光检查采用阶段的结构方程模型
Psychooncology. 2013 Oct;22(10):2339-46. doi: 10.1002/pon.3293. Epub 2013 May 10.
4
How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial.关于过度诊断信息如何改变乳腺癌筛查决策:一项随机对照试验中的中介分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e016246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016246.
5
The evolution of worry after breast cancer risk assessment: 6-year follow-up of the TRACE study cohort.乳腺癌风险评估后担忧的演变:TRACE 研究队列的 6 年随访。
Psychooncology. 2011 Sep;20(9):984-91. doi: 10.1002/pon.1807. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
6
A brief nursing intervention reduces anxiety before breast cancer screening mammography.一项简短的护理干预可降低乳腺癌筛查乳腺钼靶检查前的焦虑情绪。
Psicothema. 2015;27(2):128-33. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.203.
7
Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review.恐惧、焦虑、担忧与乳腺癌筛查行为:一项批判性综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Apr;13(4):501-10.
8
Dense breast tissue notification: impact on women's perceived risk, anxiety, and intentions for future breast cancer screening.致密乳腺组织告知:对女性感知风险、焦虑及未来乳腺癌筛查意向的影响
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Mar;12(3):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
9
Mammography Decision Aid Reduces Decisional Conflict for Women in Their Forties Considering Screening.乳腺钼靶检查决策辅助工具可减少四十多岁考虑进行筛查的女性的决策冲突。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;24(12):1013-20. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5256. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
10
Nurses' intention to support informed decision-making about breast cancer screening with mammography: a survey.护士支持通过乳房X线摄影术进行乳腺癌筛查的知情决策的意愿:一项调查。
Can J Nurs Res. 2013 Sep;45(3):136-52. doi: 10.1177/084456211304500309.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线交互式决策工具对女性乳腺癌筛查决策的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 29;27:e65974. doi: 10.2196/65974.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
3
Association between Breast Cancer Screening Intention and Behavior in the Context of Screening Cessation in Older Women.老年女性筛查终止背景下乳腺癌筛查意愿与行为之间的关联
Med Decis Making. 2021 Feb;41(2):240-244. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20979108. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model.单中介模型中测量误差和遗漏混杂因素的综合影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;51(5):681-697. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1224154.
2
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
3
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.平均风险女性的乳腺癌筛查:美国癌症协会2015年指南更新
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12783.
4
Do Emotional Appeals in Public Service Advertisements Influence Adolescents' Intention to Reduce Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages?公益广告中的情感诉求会影响青少年减少含糖饮料消费的意愿吗?
J Health Commun. 2015 Aug;20(8):938-48. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018593. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
5
Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.使用包含过度检测信息的决策辅助工具来支持有关乳腺癌筛查的知情选择:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
6
How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis.理性行为理论和计划行为理论在多大程度上能够预测筛查计划的意向和参与度?一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Health. 2008;23(7):745-65. doi: 10.1080/08870440701544437.
7
A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.系统评估获益与风险以指导乳腺癌筛查决策。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1327-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1398.
8
Worry and risk perceptions as independent and interacting predictors of health protective behaviors.担忧和风险感知作为独立和相互作用的健康保护行为预测因子。
J Health Commun. 2013;18(4):397-409. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.727954. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
9
Risk-based mammography screening: an effort to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms.基于风险的乳腺钼靶筛查:旨在使益处最大化并使危害最小化的努力。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):662-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00012.
10
Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey.乳腺癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌筛查的决策过程:DECISIONS 调查。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):53S-64S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10378701.

解释决策干预对乳房 X 光检查意向的影响:担忧、恐惧和对乳腺癌易感性的作用。

Explaining the effects of a decision intervention on mammography intentions: The roles of worry, fear and perceived susceptibility to breast cancer.

机构信息

a Annenberg School for Communication , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.

d Department of Communication , Mississippi State University , Starkville , MS , USA.

出版信息

Psychol Health. 2018 May;33(5):682-700. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1387261. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1080/08870446.2017.1387261
PMID:29073799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6139035/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the effects of a mammography decision intervention on perceived susceptibility to breast cancer (PSBC) and emotion and investigates how these outcomes predict mammography intentions.

DESIGN

Randomised between-subjects online experiment. Participants were stratified into two levels of risk. Within each stratum, conditions included a basic information condition and six decision intervention conditions that included personalised risk estimates and varied according to a 2 (amount of information: brief vs. extended) × 3 (format: expository vs. untailored exemplar vs. tailored exemplar) design. Participants included 2465 US women ages 35-49.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PSBC as a percentage, PSBC as a frequency, worry, fear and mammography intentions.

RESULTS

The intervention resulted in significant reductions in PSBC as a percentage for women in both strata and significant increases in worry and fear for women in the upper risk stratum. Of the possible mediators examined, only PSBC as a percentage was a consistent mediator of the effect of the intervention on mammography intentions.

CONCLUSION

The results provide insight into the mechanism of action of the intervention by showing that PSBC mediated the effects of the intervention on mammography intentions.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了乳腺 X 线摄影决策干预对乳腺癌感知易感性(PSBC)和情绪的影响,并探讨了这些结果如何预测乳腺 X 线摄影意向。

设计

随机分组的在线实验。参与者分为两个风险水平。在每个层次内,条件包括基本信息条件和六个决策干预条件,这些条件包括个性化风险估计,并根据 2(信息量:简要与扩展)×3(格式:说明与非定制范例与定制范例)设计而有所不同。参与者包括 2465 名年龄在 35-49 岁的美国女性。

主要结果测量

PSBC 百分比、PSBC 频率、担忧、恐惧和乳腺 X 线摄影意向。

结果

该干预措施导致两个层次中 PSBC 百分比显著降低,且高危组女性的担忧和恐惧显著增加。在所检查的可能中介因素中,只有 PSBC 百分比是干预对乳腺 X 线摄影意向影响的一致中介因素。

结论

这些结果通过显示 PSBC 中介了干预对乳腺 X 线摄影意向的影响,为干预的作用机制提供了深入了解。