Hersch Jolyn, McGeechan Kevin, Barratt Alexandra, Jansen Jesse, Irwig Les, Jacklyn Gemma, Houssami Nehmat, Dhillon Haryana, McCaffery Kirsten
School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Wiser Healthcare, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e016246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016246.
In a randomised controlled trial, we found that informing women about overdetection changed their breast screening decisions. We now present a mediation analysis exploring the psychological pathways through which study participants who received the intervention processed information about overdetection and how this influenced their decision-making. We examined a series of potential mediators in the causal chain between exposure to overdetection information and women's subsequently reported breast screening intentions.
Serial multiple mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial.
New South Wales, Australia.
811 women aged 48-50 years with no personal history of breast cancer.
Two versions of a decision aid giving women information about breast cancer deaths averted and false positives from mammography screening, either with (intervention) or without (control) information on overdetection.
Intentions to undergo breast cancer screening in the next 2-3 years.
Knowledge about overdetection, worry about breast cancer, attitudes towards breast screening and anticipated regret.
The effect of information about overdetection on women's breast screening intentions was mediated through multiple cognitive and affective processes. In particular, the information led to substantial improvements in women's understanding of overdetection, and it influenced-both directly and indirectly via its effect on knowledge-their attitudes towards having screening. Mediation analysis showed that the mechanisms involving knowledge and attitudes were particularly important in determining women's intentions about screening participation.
Even in this emotive context, new information influenced women's decision-making by changing their understanding of possible consequences of screening and their attitudes towards undergoing it. These findings emphasise the need to provide good-quality information on screening outcomes and to communicate this information effectively, so that women can make well-informed decisions.
This study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613001035718) on 17 September 2013.
在一项随机对照试验中,我们发现向女性告知过度诊断情况会改变她们的乳腺癌筛查决策。我们现在呈现一项中介分析,探究接受干预的研究参与者处理过度诊断信息的心理途径,以及这如何影响她们的决策。我们考察了一系列潜在中介因素,这些因素存在于接触过度诊断信息与女性随后报告的乳腺癌筛查意向之间的因果链中。
随机对照试验中的系列多重中介分析。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州。
811名年龄在48至50岁之间、无乳腺癌个人病史的女性。
两种版本的决策辅助工具,向女性提供关于避免乳腺癌死亡以及乳腺钼靶筛查假阳性的信息,一种包含(干预组)关于过度诊断的信息,另一种不包含(对照组)。
未来2至3年内进行乳腺癌筛查的意向。
关于过度诊断的知识、对乳腺癌的担忧、对乳腺筛查的态度以及预期遗憾。
关于过度诊断的信息对女性乳腺癌筛查意向的影响是通过多个认知和情感过程介导的。特别是,该信息极大地提高了女性对过度诊断的理解,并且直接以及通过其对知识的影响间接影响了她们对进行筛查的态度。中介分析表明,涉及知识和态度的机制在决定女性参与筛查的意向方面尤为重要。
即使在这种情绪化的背景下,新信息通过改变女性对筛查可能后果的理解以及她们对接受筛查的态度,影响了她们的决策。这些发现强调了提供关于筛查结果的高质量信息并有效传达该信息的必要性,以便女性能够做出明智的决策。
本研究于2013年9月17日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12613001035718)进行前瞻性注册。