Tong Carl W, Madhur Meena S, Rzeszut Anne K, Abdalla Marwah, Abudayyeh Islam, Alexanderson Erick, Buber Jonathan, Feldman Dmitriy N, Gopinathannair Rakesh, Hira Ravi S, Kates Andrew M, Kessler Thorsten, Leung Steve, Raj Satish R, Spatz Erica S, Turner Melanie B, Valente Anne Marie, West Kristin, Sivaram Chittur A, Hill Joseph A, Mann Douglas L, Freeman Andrew M
Department of Medical Physiology, Texas A&M University College of Medicine and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology-Temple Region, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas.
Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Division of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 31;70(18):2290-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.030.
Early-career academic cardiologists, who many believe are an important component of the future of cardiovascular care, face myriad challenges. The Early Career Section Academic Working Group of the American College of Cardiology, with senior leadership support, assessed the progress of this cohort from 2013 to 2016 with a global perspective. Data consisted of accessing National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute public information, data from the American Heart Association and international organizations, and a membership-wide survey. Although the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute increased funding of career development grants, only a small number of early-career American College of Cardiology members have benefited as funding of the entire cohort has decreased. Personal motivation, institutional support, and collaborators continued to be positive influential factors. Surprisingly, mentoring ceased to correlate positively with obtaining external grants. The totality of findings suggests that the status of early-career academic cardiologists remains challenging; therefore, the authors recommend a set of attainable solutions.
许多人认为,处于职业生涯早期的学术型心脏病专家是未来心血管护理的重要组成部分,但他们面临着无数挑战。美国心脏病学会早期职业部学术工作组在高层领导的支持下,从全球视角评估了这一群体在2013年至2016年期间的进展。数据包括获取美国国立心肺血液研究所的公共信息、美国心脏协会和国际组织的数据,以及一项全会员范围的调查。尽管美国国立心肺血液研究所增加了职业发展补助金的资金,但由于整个群体的资金减少,只有少数处于职业生涯早期的美国心脏病学会成员受益。个人动机、机构支持和合作者仍然是积极的影响因素。令人惊讶的是,指导与获得外部资助不再呈正相关。研究结果总体表明,处于职业生涯早期的学术型心脏病专家的状况仍然具有挑战性;因此,作者们推荐了一系列可行的解决方案。