Healthy London Partnerships, London, UK.
UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Feb;103(2):128-136. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313307. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
To estimate the potential impact of enhanced primary care and new out-of-hospital models (OOHMs) on emergency department (ED) presentations by children and young people (CYP).
Observational study.
PATIENTS & SETTING: Data collected prospectively on 3020 CYP 0-17.9 years from 6 London EDs during 14 days by 25 supernumerary clinicians. CYP with transient acute illness, exacerbation of long-term condition (LTC), complex LTC/disability and injury/trauma were considered manageable within OOHM. OOHMs assessed included nurse-led services, multispecialty community provider (MCP), primary and acute care system (PACS) plus current and enhanced primary care.
Diagnosis, severity; record of investigations, management and outcome that occurred; objective assessment of clinical need and potential alternative management options/destinations.
Of the patients 95.6% had diagnoses appropriate for OOHM. Most presentations required assessment by a clinician with skills in assessing illness (39.6%) or injuries (30.9%). One thousand two hundred and ninety-one (42.75%) required no investigations and 1007 (33.3%) were provided only with reassurance. Of the presentations 42.2% were judged to have been totally avoidable if the family had had better health education.Of the patients 26.1% were judged appropriate for current primary care (community pharmacy or general practice) with 31.5% appropriate for the combination of enhanced general practice and community pharmacy. Proportions suitable for new models were 14.1% for the nurse-led acute illness team, MCP 25.7%, GP federation CYP service 44.6%, comprehensive walk-in centre for CYP 64.3% and 75.5% for a PACS.
High proportions of ED presentations by CYP could potentially be managed in new OOHMs or by enhancement of existing primary care.
评估加强初级保健和新的院外模式(OOHM)对儿童和青少年(CYP)急诊科就诊的潜在影响。
观察性研究。
在伦敦 6 家急诊科的 14 天内,由 25 名额外的临床医生前瞻性地收集了 3020 名 0-17.9 岁的 CYP 的数据。患有短暂急性疾病、慢性疾病(LTC)恶化、复杂 LTC/残疾和损伤/创伤的 CYP 被认为可以在 OOHM 中得到管理。评估的 OOHM 包括护士主导的服务、多专科社区提供者(MCP)、初级和急性护理系统(PACS)以及当前和增强的初级保健。
诊断、严重程度;记录发生的检查、管理和结果;对临床需求的客观评估以及潜在的替代管理方案/目的地。
95.6%的患者有适合 OOHM 的诊断。大多数就诊需要有评估疾病(39.6%)或损伤(30.9%)技能的临床医生进行评估。1291 例(42.75%)不需要检查,1007 例(33.3%)仅得到安慰。如果家庭接受了更好的健康教育,42.2%的就诊被认为是完全可以避免的。26.1%的患者被认为适合当前的初级保健(社区药房或全科医生),31.5%的患者适合增强的全科医生和社区药房联合治疗。适合新模式的比例分别为:急性疾病护理团队的护士主导 14.1%,MCP 25.7%,全科医生联合会 CYP 服务 44.6%,综合青少年步行中心 64.3%和 PACS 75.5%。
高比例的 CYP 急诊科就诊可以潜在地通过新的 OOHM 或增强现有的初级保健来管理。