• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童非紧急急诊就诊情况:回顾性观察分析。

Non-urgent emergency department attendances in children: a retrospective observational analysis.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2022 Jan;39(1):17-22. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211431. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2021-211431
PMID:34711634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8717488/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A significant proportion of ED attendances in children may be non-urgent attendances (NUAs), which could be better managed elsewhere. This study aimed to quantify NUAs and urgent attendances (UAs) in children to ED and determine which children present in this way and when.

METHODS

Dataset extracted from the CUREd research database containing linked data on the provision of care in Yorkshire and Humber. Analysis focused on children's ED attendances (April 2014-March 2017). Summary statistics and odds ratios (OR) comparing NUAs and UAs were examined by: age, mode and time of arrival and deprivation alongside comparing summary statistics for waiting, treatment and total department times.

RESULTS

NUAs were more likely in younger children: OR for NUA in children aged 1-4 years, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.83), age 15 years, 0.39 (95% CI: 0.38 to 0.40), when compared with those under 1 year. NUAs were more likely to arrive out of hours (OOHs) compared with in hours: OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.20), and OOHs arrivals were less common in older children compared with those under 1 year: age 1-4 years, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84 to 0.89) age 15 years, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.69). NUAs also spent less total time in the ED, with a median (IQR) of 98 min (60-147) compared with 127 min (80-185) for UAs.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of ED attendances in children are NUAs. Our data suggest there are particular groups of children for whom targeted interventions would be most beneficial. Children under 5 years would be such a group, particularly in providing accessible, timely care outside of usual community care opening hours.

摘要

简介

在儿童中,相当一部分 ED 就诊可能是非紧急就诊(NUA),这些就诊可以在其他地方得到更好的管理。本研究旨在量化儿童 ED 就诊中的 NUA 和紧急就诊(UA),并确定以这种方式就诊的儿童及其就诊时间。

方法

从包含约克郡和亨伯地区护理提供数据的 CUREd 研究数据库中提取数据集。分析重点是儿童 ED 就诊(2014 年 4 月至 2017 年 3 月)。通过年龄、就诊模式和到达时间以及贫困程度,比较 NUA 和 UA 的汇总统计数据和优势比(OR),并比较等待、治疗和整个部门时间的汇总统计数据。

结果

年龄较小的儿童更有可能出现 NUA:年龄在 1-4 岁的儿童 NUA 的 OR 为 0.82(95%CI:0.80 至 0.83),年龄在 15 岁的儿童 OR 为 0.39(95%CI:0.38 至 0.40),与 1 岁以下儿童相比。与在工作时间就诊相比,NUA 更有可能在工作时间之外(OOHs)就诊:OR 为 1.19(95%CI 1.18 至 1.20),并且 OOHs 就诊在年龄较大的儿童中比 1 岁以下儿童更少见:年龄在 1-4 岁的儿童 OR 为 0.87(95%CI:0.84 至 0.89),年龄在 15 岁的儿童 OR 为 0.66(95%CI:0.63 至 0.69)。NUA 在 ED 中的总时间也较短,中位数(IQR)为 98 分钟(60-147),而 UA 为 127 分钟(80-185)。

结论

儿童 ED 就诊中相当一部分是 NUA。我们的数据表明,有特定的儿童群体可以从有针对性的干预措施中获益最大。5 岁以下的儿童就是这样一个群体,特别是在提供可及、及时的社区护理之外的护理方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df0/8717488/2c0695554f73/emermed-2021-211431f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df0/8717488/3b5b4c884855/emermed-2021-211431f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df0/8717488/1b9a277b5bd1/emermed-2021-211431f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df0/8717488/2c0695554f73/emermed-2021-211431f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df0/8717488/3b5b4c884855/emermed-2021-211431f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df0/8717488/1b9a277b5bd1/emermed-2021-211431f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df0/8717488/2c0695554f73/emermed-2021-211431f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-urgent emergency department attendances in children: a retrospective observational analysis.儿童非紧急急诊就诊情况:回顾性观察分析。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Jan;39(1):17-22. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211431. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
3
Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances by GPs: a retrospective observational study.家庭医生对非紧急儿科就诊的管理:一项回顾性观察研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec 28;71(702):e22-e30. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713885. Print 2021 Jan.
4
Factors associated with longer wait times, admission and reattendances in older patients attending emergency departments: an analysis of linked healthcare data.与老年患者在急诊就诊时等待时间延长、入院和再次就诊相关的因素:对医疗保健相关数据的分析。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Apr;40(4):248-256. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212303. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Paediatric attendances of the emergency department in a major Irish tertiary referral centre before and after expansion of free GP care to children under 6: a retrospective observational study.爱尔兰主要的三级转诊中心在向 6 岁以下儿童免费提供全科医生护理前后的急诊儿科就诊情况:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Feb 17;5(1):e000862. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000862. eCollection 2021.
6
Frequent attendances at emergency departments in England.英格兰急诊频繁就诊。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Oct;37(10):597-599. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208189. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Retrospective observational study of neonatal attendances to a children's emergency department.回顾性观察研究:儿童急诊科新生儿就诊情况。
Acta Paediatr. 2021 Nov;110(11):2968-2975. doi: 10.1111/apa.16039. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
8
To GP or not to GP: a natural experiment in children triaged to see a GP in a tertiary paediatric emergency department (ED).是否看全科医生:在三级儿科急诊分诊看全科医生的儿童自然试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):521-528. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006605. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
9
Emergency department use during COVID-19 as described by syndromic surveillance.基于症状监测描述的 COVID-19 期间急诊科的使用情况。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Oct;37(10):600-604. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209980. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
Who breaches the four-hour emergency department wait time target? A retrospective analysis of 374,000 emergency department attendances between 2008 and 2013 at a type 1 emergency department in England.谁未达到急诊科四小时等待时间目标?对2008年至2013年间英格兰一家一级急诊科的37.4万例急诊科就诊病例进行的回顾性分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 2;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0145-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital healthcare interventions to support parents with acutely ill children at home: A systematic review.支持家中有急症患儿的家长的数字医疗干预措施:一项系统综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Sep 15;4(9):e0000998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000998. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Supporting infants and parents in the perinatal period (SIPP): Co-creating an improved journey.围产期支持婴幼儿及父母项目(SIPP):共同打造更好的就医体验。
PLoS One. 2025 May 12;20(5):e0305786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305786. eCollection 2025.
3
Avoidable visits to the paediatric emergency department: associated factors and lessons learned from the pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient compliance with NHS 111 advice: Analysis of adult call and ED attendance data 2013-2017.患者对国民保健制度 111 热线建议的遵从性:2013-2017 年成人来电和急症室就诊数据分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0251362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251362. eCollection 2021.
2
How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study.可避免的急诊就诊对初级保健质量有多敏感?回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):884-892. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
3
Non-urgent paediatric emergency department presentation: A systematic review.
可避免的儿科急诊科就诊:相关因素及从疫情中吸取的教训
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05523-w.
4
Factors influencing paramedic conveyance decisions when attending children with minor head injury: a qualitative study.影响护理人员运送轻微头部受伤儿童决策的因素:一项定性研究
Emerg Med J. 2025 May 22;42(6):352-359. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214467.
5
Neighbourhood socioeconomic conditions and emergency admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions in children: a longitudinal ecological analysis in England, 2012-2017.邻里社会经济状况与儿童门诊护理敏感疾病的急诊入院情况:2012 - 2017年英格兰的纵向生态分析
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jan 19;9(1):e002991. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002991.
6
Association between emergency department attendances, sociodemographic factors and long-term health conditions in the population of Norfolk and Waveney, England: Cross sectional study.英格兰诺福克和大雅茅斯地区急诊就诊与人口社会学因素及长期健康状况的关系:横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0303270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303270. eCollection 2024.
7
Fever education for caregivers in the emergency room (The FEVER study)-an interventional trial.急诊室护理人员发热教育(FEVER 研究)-一项干预性试验。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Jul;96(1):172-176. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03047-0. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Determinants of caregiver's knowledge and practices regarding childhood fever management in a developing setting: a multi-centre cross-sectional assessment.发展中地区照顾者关于儿童发热管理的知识和实践的决定因素:一项多中心横断面评估
Front Pediatr. 2023 Aug 22;11:1119067. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1119067. eCollection 2023.
9
Creating a Real-World Linked Research Platform for Analyzing the Urgent and Emergency Care System.创建一个真实世界的链接研究平台,用于分析急救和紧急护理系统。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):999-1009. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221098699. Epub 2022 May 14.
非紧急儿科急诊科就诊情况:一项系统评价。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Mar;55(3):271-277. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14352. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
5
The impact of out-of-hospital models of care on paediatric emergency department presentations.院外护理模式对儿科急诊就诊的影响。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Feb;103(2):128-136. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313307. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
6
Why do parents use the emergency department for minor injury and illness? A cross-sectional questionnaire.为什么父母会因轻伤和小病而去急诊科?一项横断面问卷调查。
JRSM Open. 2016 Feb 12;7(3):2054270415623695. doi: 10.1177/2054270415623695. eCollection 2016 Mar.
7
Understanding Low-Acuity Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department.了解小儿急诊科的低 acuity 就诊情况。 (注:这里的“acuity”常见释义为“敏锐;尖锐;(视力、思维、感官等的)敏锐度” ,结合语境推测这里可能是指病情严重程度较低的就诊情况,但仅从字面准确翻译就是上述译文 )
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0128927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128927. eCollection 2015.
8
Reconnecting patients with their primary care provider: an intervention for reducing nonurgent pediatric emergency department visits.让患者重新与他们的初级保健提供者建立联系:一项减少非紧急儿科急诊科就诊的干预措施。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014 Sep;53(10):988-94. doi: 10.1177/0009922814540987. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
9
Who uses emergency departments inappropriately and when - a national cross-sectional study using a monitoring data system.谁在不恰当地使用急诊科,以及何时使用——一项使用监测数据系统的全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2013 Dec 13;11:258. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-258.
10
Suitability of emergency department attenders to be assessed in primary care: survey of general practitioner agreement in a random sample of triage records analysed in a service evaluation project.在初级保健中评估急诊科就诊者的适宜性:在服务评估项目中对分诊记录进行随机抽样分析,调查全科医生的一致性。
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 6;3(12):e003612. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003612.