• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rancher-reported efficacy of lethal and non-lethal livestock predation mitigation strategies for a suite of carnivores.牧场主报告的一系列食肉动物的致死和非致死的牲畜捕食缓解策略的效果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 26;7(1):14105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14462-1.
2
Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock.大 carnivores(大 carnivores 是对肉食性哺乳动物的统称,在中文中没有统一的翻译,通常翻译为“大型食肉动物”或“肉食哺乳动物”)与家畜之间的冲突管理。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12959. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Expanding beyond carnivores to improve livestock protection and conservation.超越肉食动物,改善家畜保护和保育。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 6;17(8):e3000386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000386. eCollection 2019 Aug.
4
Determinants of persistence and tolerance of carnivores on Namibian ranches: implications for conservation on Southern African private lands.纳米比亚牧场中肉食动物的持久性和耐受性的决定因素:对南部非洲私人土地保护的启示。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052458. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
5
Humans-livestock predators conflict in the Central and Eastern Part of Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia.人类与牲畜捕食者在埃塞俄比亚的 Bale 山脉国家公园中部和东部发生冲突。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Oct 4;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02065-y.
6
Patterns of livestock predation by carnivores: human-wildlife conflict in northwest Yunnan, China.家畜被食肉动物捕食的模式:中国滇西北的人兽冲突。
Environ Manage. 2013 Dec;52(6):1334-40. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0192-8. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
7
Killing wolves to prevent predation on livestock may protect one farm but harm neighbors.捕杀狼以防止其捕食家畜可能会保护一个农场,但却会对邻居造成损害。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0189729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189729. eCollection 2018.
8
Author Correction: Rancher-reported efficacy of lethal and non-lethal livestock predation mitigation strategies for a suite of carnivores.作者更正:牧场主报告的针对一系列食肉动物的致死和非致死牲畜捕食缓解策略的效果。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 16;8(1):7963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26270-2.
9
Generalization of threats attributed to large carnivores in areas of high human-wildlife conflict.归因于高人类-野生动物冲突地区的大型食肉动物的威胁的泛化。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Oct;36(5):e13974. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13974. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Desert pastoralists' negative and positive effects on rare wildlife in the Gobi.沙漠牧民对戈壁地区珍稀野生动物的负面影响与正面影响。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):269-277. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12881. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Empirical evidence that diversionary feeding increases productivity in ground-nesting birds.有经验证据表明,替代性喂食可提高地面筑巢鸟类的繁殖率。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jun;292(2049):20242921. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2921. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
2
Management of Coexistence and Conflicts Between Humans and Macaques in Japan.日本人类与猕猴共存及冲突的管理
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;15(6):888. doi: 10.3390/ani15060888.
3
Small-livestock farmers' perceived effectiveness of predation control methods and the correlates of reported illegal poison use in the South African Karoo.南非卡鲁地区小牲畜养殖户对捕食控制方法效果的认知,以及与非法使用毒药相关的因素。
Ambio. 2023 Oct;52(10):1635-1649. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01892-7. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
4
Social perception of mesocarnivores within hunting areas differs from actual species abundance.狩猎区内中大型食肉动物的社会认知与实际物种丰度存在差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0283882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283882. eCollection 2023.
5
Low-stress livestock handling protects cattle in a five-predator habitat.低应激牲畜处理保护了五种掠食性动物栖息地的牛。
PeerJ. 2023 Feb 10;11:e14788. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14788. eCollection 2023.
6
Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures.南非商业农民中毒使用的流行率和驱动因素以及对替代牲畜保护措施的看法。
Ambio. 2021 Jun;50(6):1211-1221. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01461-2. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Limited evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce livestock predation by large carnivores.干预措施减少大型食肉动物对家畜捕食的有效性的证据有限。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 18;7(1):2097. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02323-w.
2
Global patterns and trends in human-wildlife conflict compensation.人类与野生动物冲突补偿的全球模式与趋势
Conserv Biol. 2017 Dec;31(6):1247-1256. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12948. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
3
Fencing bodes a rapid collapse of the unique Greater Mara ecosystem. fencing 预示着大马赛伦生态系统的迅速崩溃。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 25;7:41450. doi: 10.1038/srep41450.
4
A biodiversity hotspot losing its top predator: The challenge of jaguar conservation in the Atlantic Forest of South America.生物多样性热点地区失去顶级捕食者:南美洲大西洋森林中美洲虎保护面临的挑战。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 16;6:37147. doi: 10.1038/srep37147.
5
No proof that predator culls save livestock, study claims.研究称,没有证据表明捕杀食肉动物能保护牲畜。
Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):1080-1. doi: 10.1126/science.353.6304.1080.
6
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade: reply.狼在拯救黄石国家公园的山杨吗?对行为介导的营养级联的景观尺度测试:回应。
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1425-31. doi: 10.1890/11-1404.1.
7
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade: comment.狼在拯救黄石国家公园的山杨吗?对行为介导的营养级联的景观尺度测试:评论
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1420-5. doi: 10.1890/11-0063.1.
8
The presence of black vultures at the calving sites and its effects on cows' and calves' behaviour immediately following parturition.黑兀鹫在产犊地的出现及其对产后立即的母牛和牛犊行为的影响。
Animal. 2013 Mar;7(3):469-75. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001735. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
9
Carnivore-livestock conflicts: effects of subsidized predator control and economic correlates on the sheep industry.食肉动物与家畜的冲突:补贴性捕食者控制的影响及经济关联对养羊业的作用
Conserv Biol. 2006 Jun;20(3):751-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00336.x.

牧场主报告的一系列食肉动物的致死和非致死的牲畜捕食缓解策略的效果。

Rancher-reported efficacy of lethal and non-lethal livestock predation mitigation strategies for a suite of carnivores.

机构信息

Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA.

Extension, University of Wyoming, Thermopolis, WY, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 26;7(1):14105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14462-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14462-1
PMID:29074881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5658346/
Abstract

Pastoralists have dealt with livestock losses from predators for millennia, yet effective mitigation strategies that balance wildlife conservation and sustainable agriculture are still needed today. In Wyoming, USA, 274 ranchers responded to a retrospective survey, and rated the efficacy of predation mitigation strategies for foxes, dogs, coyotes, wolves, bobcats, mountain lions, bears, and birds (buzzards, eagles, hawks, ravens). Rancher reported efficacy of mitigation varied by predator species, mitigation strategy, and lethality of strategies, but not livestock type. Ranchers perceive they were most effective at mitigating predation by foxes and coyotes, moderately effective at mitigating large carnivores, and the least effective at mitigating birds. Ranchers also reported that avian predators seem to be the most challenging predator type. The general perception was lethal mitigation strategies were more effective than non-lethal strategies, with guard animals showing the most potential among the non-lethal options. In general, ranchers did not perceive non-lethal strategies as a proxy for lethal strategies. However, a few ranchers reported being successful with non-lethal options such as herding, fencing, and stalling at night but more details about such successful applications are needed. Innovation in current or novel non-lethal mitigation strategies, and examples of efficacy, are needed to justify producer adoption.

摘要

牧民在过去几千年中一直应对着来自捕食者的牲畜损失,但今天仍需要平衡野生动物保护和可持续农业的有效缓解策略。在美国怀俄明州,274 名牧场主对一项回顾性调查做出了回应,并对狐狸、狗、郊狼、狼、山猫、美洲狮、熊和鸟类(秃鹫、鹰、鹰、乌鸦)的捕食缓解策略的效果进行了评级。牧场主报告的缓解效果因捕食者物种、缓解策略和策略的致命性而异,但与牲畜类型无关。牧场主认为他们在缓解狐狸和郊狼的捕食方面最有效,在缓解大型食肉动物方面效果适中,在缓解鸟类方面效果最差。牧场主还报告说,鸟类捕食者似乎是最具挑战性的捕食者类型。一般的看法是,致命的缓解策略比非致命的策略更有效,而在非致命的选择中,守护动物显示出最大的潜力。总的来说,牧场主并不认为非致命策略是致命策略的替代品。然而,一些牧场主报告说,使用放牧、围栏和夜间阻挡等非致命选择取得了成功,但需要更多关于此类成功应用的详细信息。需要创新当前或新颖的非致命缓解策略,并证明其效果,以证明生产者的采用是合理的。