Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, Republic of Korea.
J Neurol. 2017 Dec;264(12):2450-2456. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8655-0. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
The clinical implications of the CT hyperdense artery sign have yet to be established in the new era of modern mechanical thrombectomy. This study aimed to investigate prognostic implications of the CT hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (HMCAS) on treatment outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy for acute MCA occlusions. A retrospective analysis of CT and clinical data from 212 patients with acute MCA occlusions who underwent mechanical thrombectomy was conducted. HMCAS was determined with visual assessment by consensus of two readers. Interobserver agreement was measured. HMCAS was classified into two groups: M1 and M2 HMCAS. Associations between HMCAS and vascular risk factors, stroke etiology, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Of 212 patients, HMCAS was identified in 118 patients (55.7%). Overall, successful reperfusion was achieved in 82.5% (175/212) and a good outcome in 45.8% (97/212). There was no significant association between HMCAS and treatment outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy, regardless of HMCAS location. Cardioembolism was more frequent in patients with a positive HMCAS (67.8 vs 48.9%, P = 0.005). Large-artery atherosclerosis was more frequent in patients with a negative HMCAS (31.9 vs 12.7%, P = 0.001). Underlying severe MCA stenosis was more frequently observed in patients with a negative HMCAS (25.5 vs 3.4%, P < 0.001). Our study suggests that the prognostic implication of a HMCAS in predicting outcomes after endovascular therapy in patients with acute MCA occlusion may be low in the era of modern mechanical thrombectomy. Negative HMCAS is predictive of in situ thrombotic occlusion due to underlying severe atherosclerotic stenosis in such patients.
在现代机械取栓新时代,CT 高密度动脉征的临床意义尚未确定。本研究旨在探讨机械取栓治疗急性 MCA 闭塞后 CT 高密度大脑中动脉征(HMCAS)对治疗结果的预后意义。对 212 例接受机械取栓治疗的急性 MCA 闭塞患者的 CT 和临床数据进行了回顾性分析。通过两位读者的共识进行视觉评估来确定 HMCAS。测量了观察者间的一致性。将 HMCAS 分为 M1 和 M2 HMCAS 两组。分析 HMCAS 与血管危险因素、中风病因和治疗结果之间的关系。在 212 例患者中,118 例(55.7%)存在 HMCAS。总的来说,212 例患者中有 82.5%(175/212)实现了成功再灌注,45.8%(97/212)获得了良好的结局。无论 HMCAS 位置如何,机械取栓后 HMCAS 与治疗结果之间均无显著关联。阳性 HMCAS 患者的心脏栓塞更为常见(67.8%比 48.9%,P=0.005)。阴性 HMCAS 患者的大动脉粥样硬化更为常见(31.9%比 12.7%,P=0.001)。阴性 HMCAS 患者更常观察到基底 MCA 严重狭窄(25.5%比 3.4%,P<0.001)。本研究表明,在现代机械取栓时代,HMCAS 对预测急性 MCA 闭塞患者血管内治疗后结局的预后意义可能较低。阴性 HMCAS 预示着由于基底严重动脉粥样硬化狭窄而导致原位血栓性闭塞。